Parmandur
Book-Friend
Perhaps. To me, it explicitly read as a race without the capacity to form attachments or feel things like love and hate.
Or that's how Volo, notoriously unreliable, understands them.
Perhaps. To me, it explicitly read as a race without the capacity to form attachments or feel things like love and hate.
We have enough emotional intelligent reptiles in kobolds and dragons and Yuan-Ti, etc.
I see nothing wrong with there being one intelligent, non-emotional reptilian race. I would play one like a Vulcan. Or more specifically like Spock, which gives the chance of a very unexpected emotional outburst happening.
We have enough emotional intelligent reptiles in kobolds and dragons and Yuan-Ti, etc.
I see nothing wrong with there being one intelligent, non-emotional reptilian race. I would play one like a Vulcan. Or more specifically like Spock, which gives the chance of a very unexpected emotional outburst happening.
Ah, but Vulcans experience emotions. The writeup says lizardfolk don't. They experience no internal emotional reactions. The closest they get is a protective instinct toward beings who are useful but weaker than the lizardfolk.
Vulcans are interesting because of that duality in their nature. They experience emotions so deeply and strongly that they must sublimate them in order to have an advanced society, and as a result present as coldly logical and emotionless.
Once again this is way more interesting then making them scaly humans. And Lizardfolk are not reptiles they are their own intelligent species. They are not humans, nor are they reptiles. Like I don't get why you would want to change this.
Uh it states in the page that they form attachments.
Having read the fluff page for them, I now wonder, are the Lizardfolk the race @mearls saw as filling the role of Gnolls for those who wanted a savage unbound by social norms...?