... but given how the MAJORITY of people are responding to those polls saying they are NOT satisfied with the classes as-written...
Well, he's a new 5e player (new potential boyfriend of one of the player) so I often just say: ''Dont ask ''if'', just describe, I'll call the roll as I see fit''. I think he's just used to have a system that dont rely much on player imagination, instead having a rule for each slight variation of a theme or action. He does have a hard time figuring out how to make a character concept if there's not one one class option called the name he's looking for. He's already complaining about being restricted by character options, even though I allow mostly everything. I think he had a heart attack when I told him about the rate of publication of new PC options this edition.
Nope. You are counting "mostly satisfied" because it sounds positive as a whole, but it still implies that they want or "need" changes. I am counting only players who are satisfied with things as they are, instead of thinking how they could or "should" be.
Barbarian: 28% sat, 72% unsat
Bard: 47% sat, 53% unsat
Cleric: 42% sat, 58% unsat
Druid: 25% sat, 75% unsat
Fighter: 38% sat, 62% unsat
"unsat" = "want to change at least something"
Blow his mind and say you can re-flavor a Paladin to be a Psychic Warrior, psionics-based fighter that uses his mastery of mental powers to do all of his effects. All he has to do is make up a story for them and you'll do it.
Like, 'Divine Sense' is that outer planes and undead things give off brain waves that stand out from normal living things in a way that generates a unique signature. Oath of Devotion is just the result of the absolute self-mastery of long contemplation that has derived the absolute truth of humanity's natural way of being in the absence of other influences, and his job is to use his power to bring that self-knowledge to others.
Film it if possible.![]()