Possibly but this implies they didn't know they were going to move when the survey went up. Which is unlikely.Or it could the fact they are moving offices.
Not necessarily in that something could have been overlooked that caused the delay. I really doubt it was anything in the survey packet that caused it as they should have a cycle for that anyway. In that the survey material gets considered over the coming weeks and then feedback into the test.Possibly but this implies they didn't know they were going to move when the survey went up. Which is unlikely.
They don't stop you from taking the survey multiple times. IDK, they might not count submissions after the first or just consider the last one.I believe there is an Id tag from DnDBeyond. So if you can they’ll know it was you again, unless you do some shenanigans, probably, maybe.
or less...Might have gotten back more responses than anticipated. Curious to know the results.
or less...
maybe they counted on getting X % of the people that down loaded the file to reply and they extended it so more could get in.
I dint think so. For ex they would have made some kind of announcement.I wouldn't be surprised if the download to survey response ratio for this was much lower than the typical UA.
why? I am not being glib here, but what would be the benefit of Wotc admitting if (random example) less then 1/3 of the people who down loaded it answered the survey?I dint think so. For ex they would have made some kind of announcement.
They’d make an announcement that the survey is still open.why? I am not being glib here, but what would be the benefit of Wotc admitting if (random example) less then 1/3 of the people who down loaded it answered the survey?