Possibly dumb poll: Playing vs. Running D&D Editions

Which of the following would you be willing to do semi-regularly?



log in or register to remove this ad



Oops, voted according to what I'm actually doing at the moment. :o Add some more votes in for me, mm'k? Like, I'd be happy running and/or playing AD&D 1e, or the B/X (etc.) array of games. Haven't tried OD&D, so not sure there, and I didn't like 2e. Oh, and 4e. . . just no.
 



I'll play any version with a good DM, a good setting, and a nice mix of exploration/combat/intrigue/roleplaying, etc.

I've no desire to DM 3.X again at all, nor DM 1E (at least by the book).
 

I'll play pretty much anything except 3e/3.5. I've been there, done that for the last 8 years, and its just not a satisfying play experience to me.

I'd run 1e, 2e, or 4e. I don't think there is anything that could entice me to run 3e/3.5/Pathfinder again- I really disliked prepping and running it. I'd probably run OD&D and Basic D&D, but I just haven't had much experience with them, so thats a harder call to make.
 

While 4e is my favorite iteration of d&D, I ran a few games of Red Box (Moldvay) Basic for my nephews last year and everyone had a great time. They moved away in December, taking my box and Basic modules with them. ;)

So yeah, I'd do it again should there be interest. But there isn't.
 


Remove ads

Top