Kobold Avenger Legend Oct 7, 2008 #21 Eventually there needs to be a pure implement-using defender class. I think it's possible, but I don't think it'll be the primal defender.
Eventually there needs to be a pure implement-using defender class. I think it's possible, but I don't think it'll be the primal defender.
cdrcjsn First Post Oct 7, 2008 #22 Fallen Seraph said: Wasn't one idea roaming about was a "Warden" class. I could see that being a neat defender idea. "This is my land and you will not cross!" He raises his greatsword as the land around him also rises up to keep the enemies at bay. Click to expand... WotC "Hey guys, I don't think we have enough War- names. Hows about another one?" Warlock Warlord Not to mention Warshaman, Warbard, Warbarian...
Fallen Seraph said: Wasn't one idea roaming about was a "Warden" class. I could see that being a neat defender idea. "This is my land and you will not cross!" He raises his greatsword as the land around him also rises up to keep the enemies at bay. Click to expand... WotC "Hey guys, I don't think we have enough War- names. Hows about another one?" Warlock Warlord Not to mention Warshaman, Warbard, Warbarian...
S SKyOdin First Post Oct 7, 2008 #23 I would like to see the Druid be a Defender actually, particularly if they do go the wildshape route for it. A spell-casting based defender would help break down the notion that all Defenders need to have some basis in the Fighter class.
I would like to see the Druid be a Defender actually, particularly if they do go the wildshape route for it. A spell-casting based defender would help break down the notion that all Defenders need to have some basis in the Fighter class.
