Problem Rules - Help me out with this list of debatable rules.

[Ristamar]

Woops, you're right. My bad. I don't know what I was thinking.

Scratch that then. 3 squares rule!

 

[IceBear]

It's ok...Canada is winning 4-1 in the semi-final hockey game so I am HAPPY!!!



IceBear

 

[ruleslawyer]

Artoomis: May I suggest starting a clean thread where you list each problem rule, and then suggested interpretations to date? Thus, for example, you could have the mind blank question, and then the Sage's ruling and the contrary interpretation as forwarded by KarinsDad, as well as Monte's 2 cents on MB/True Strike. I know I'd find this very helpful.

 

[IceBear]

But that's just duplicating threads really.

IceBear

 

[Artoomis]

Artoomis: May I suggest starting a clean thread where you list each problem rule, and then suggested interpretations to date? Thus, for example, you could have the mind blank question, and then the Sage's ruling and the contrary interpretation as forwarded by KarinsDad, as well as Monte's 2 cents on MB/True Strike. I know I'd find this very helpful.

I intend to get there - first I am collecting all the issues only, so that I don't accidently restart any debates.

What you want would be extremely useful, I think. I think we've played 3e enough now to identify most of the issues. But one step at a time. Once I feel like we've got a pretty good list of the issues, we'll move on.

 

[Artoomis]

But that's just duplicating threads really.

IceBear

It would not be so much duplicating as consolidating all the old hot issues in oneplace. Creating one common place to point people to when they have questions on these topics.

 

[IceBear]

Yes...this thread sure, but it sounded like Ruleslawyer wanted you to do a thread for EACH issue

IceBear

 

[Ristamar]

I have a growing suspicion that this whole scheme isn't about consolidation or claifying issues, but instead it's just an elaborate way for Artoomis to jack up his post count.

 

[Artoomis]

I have a growing suspicion that this whole scheme isn't about consolidation or claifying issues, but instead it's just an elaborate way for Artoomis to jack up his post count.

It's not about post count - who really cares how many times I've posted, eh? And if anyone really DOES care, then: Get a Life!

As for clarifying issues - no not my intent, only consolidating. Once here to just state the issues, then in a nice clean thread to include, as briefly as I can, the positions on both sides and any "official" (sage) and "semi-offical" (game designers) rulings.

Naturally. I'll need lots of help on that.

 

[Ristamar]

Merely a joke, my friend... merely a joke.