Are we voting according to fluff or crunch?
Either way, I'm voting against the half-elves. D&D is predicated on racial generalizations -- I call it "racist but not" -- and I've always felt that people who chose to play half-elves were indecisive people who couldn't commit to one set of racial assumptions.
It's like, "Hmm! I want to be strong, sturdy and courageous like a dwarf, but I don't want to be stubborn or made fun of because of my height, so can I like, be a half-dwarf?"
I'd probably be more respectful of the half-elf if players deliberately chose to play up their mixed ancestry as part of their character background, but more often than not, they don't.
Either way, I'm voting against the half-elves. D&D is predicated on racial generalizations -- I call it "racist but not" -- and I've always felt that people who chose to play half-elves were indecisive people who couldn't commit to one set of racial assumptions.
It's like, "Hmm! I want to be strong, sturdy and courageous like a dwarf, but I don't want to be stubborn or made fun of because of my height, so can I like, be a half-dwarf?"
I'd probably be more respectful of the half-elf if players deliberately chose to play up their mixed ancestry as part of their character background, but more often than not, they don't.