Ridley's Cohort said:I find that incredibly annoying.
I see no logical reason that Favored Enemy should work be fundamentally worse than Weapon Specialization when it comes to damage dealing. If special knowledge and skill about a specific kind of enemy is of no effect, why should very generalized knowledge about using a specific weapon be so much better?
So, what's the primary source here? DMG or MM?boolean said:There's something even more annoying. The text about being immune to favored enemy damage is only in the DMG description of Incorporeality. It isn't in the MM.
pawsplay said:The MM is the primary source for monster descriptions, templates, and supernatural, extraordinary, and spell-like abilities.
I don't see the primary source rule as being necessary, as the text is not conflicting. It's just incomplete in one source.Legildur said:So, what's the primary source here? DMG or MM?
I kind of doubt it was a hold over considering the text is new to 3.5. The texts is so well buried it is possible the authorFireLance said:For what it's worth, I believe the DMG description was a hold-over from the 3.0 rules. There was quite an extensive discussion of incorporeality in Libris Mortis, and at no point was immunity to extra damage from favored enemy mentioned.