I fully agree. Taking heavy inspiration from the Alexandrian Remix and adding plenty of my stuff, I'm enjoying it greatly (and apparently so do the players). So, as a campaign framework, I'm loving it, but I would never run it as presented in the book.
I seem to recall the books werent all that great either. Wasnt it the one with the fiend/elemental/god/whatever of mud in the Moonsheas?
This is a great product. There is another I'd post, but it's mine....so no.
Nah, the one with the blue tattoos and the bizarrely different groups. It reads and plays, like it was a badly designed party and the DM was winging it session by session depending on what was in that months dungeon magazine.
Oh god, I just reread the synopsis, what a hot mess!Nah, the one with the blue tattoos and the bizarrely different groups. It reads and plays, like it was a badly designed party and the DM was winging it session by session depending on what was in that months dungeon magazine.
I've read that it takes a good GM to run it. I'm currently in it as a player (psi warrior, an old scholar who knows his way with a sword) and I have to agree on the weakness of the hook. The thing that made us accept is that we had all been reunited from all over northern faerun - we had ties to a village destroyed by giants a while back - so we decided that it seemed to be Fate.
In fact last session was stellar.
