Then I would have to give it a 1.5DonTadow said:Would love to see the next movie review have a 1 to 5 poll. I think that would give a more accurate view of the movie.
I was going to post my "6, because..." and list a couple of things, but eerily, it was done for me.Pants said:I gave it a 6 for two, BIG reasons:
1) Waaaay too long.
2) Despite it being long it doesn't develop half it's characters properly even the transformers don't get more than a passing nod. The decepticons are woefully under-represented and are reduced to the 'here's my name and I'm coming rargh' scene near the end.
Honorable Mention: Too much time is devoted to extraneous characters that don't do crap or lame side stories when that time could either be devoted to a) shortening the story a tad, b) developing the already large amount of characters (or at least making an effort to) or c) at least ramping up the robot on robot action just a wee bit more.
Thanks to you too, Agamon!Agamon said:Didn't suck, but I wasn't all that impressed. Too many extraneous roles. The whole hacker subplot is unnecessary. The humor was pretty much horrible. The end fight was cool, if too long.
Agamon said:Gave it a 7. Didn't suck, but I wasn't all that impressed. Too many extraneous roles. The whole hacker subplot is unnecessary. The humor was pretty much horrible. The end fight was cool, if too long. Decent action pic otherwise. Spidey and Knocked Up are still the best movies this year so far.
GlassJaw said:SM3 was awful.
Glad to be a service!Arnwyn said:Thanks for saving me some typing work, Pants!![]()
I think they're actually pretty similar in quality, though I liked SM3 a little better... for whatever weird reasons.GlassJaw said:You said Transformers has too many "extraneous" roles yet you liked SM3? Whatever. SM3 was awful.