Infiniti2000
First Post
The only problem I'm having with this whole thing is wondering how in the world do you pronounce Xaxos.
Lord Zardoz said:yeah, I screwed up the question. I will edit it.
Infiniti2000 said:The only problem I'm having with this whole thing is wondering how in the world do you pronounce Xaxos.
I agree.Hypersmurf said:In case B, the actions are resolved Xaxos, Tim, Bob. Bob's action triggers Tim's action, Tim's action triggers Xaxos' action. No problem.
I disagree technically with part of the reasoning, although I agree with the outcome.Hypersmurf said:In case A, we have a problem, because Bob's action triggers both Tim's and Xaxos' actions. In this case, I would not require a separate initiative roll - the 'roll' has been determined by the rules of Ready (just before Bob's initiative). So rather, I'd use the rule for resolving a tie - not highest Dexterity modifier, but rather highest Initiative modifier. Only in the case where Tim and Xaxos have identical Initiative modifiers would I require a roll-off.
Yep. I typically explain such things by stating that we are not determining what action is necessarily started first, but what order the actions are RESOLVED in. Logically Bob must act first, then Tim, then Xaxos, but we are determining that their actions are nonetheless RESOLVED in the opposite order.Hypersmurf said:Post-edit, the order is definitely Xaxos, Tim, Bob.
evilbob said:I believe no check is necessary (not even a roll-off), because initiative has already been evaluated and set. If Tim readied an action before Xaxos readied an action and they are triggered by the same thing: Tim's readied action goes first.