pawsplay
Hero
What I am saying is that within specific groups of people dialogue and debate progress until certain things are taken for granted. We sometimes call this intellectual inbreeding. To outsiders, what the group takes for granted can be seen as shocking and distasteful but to them it is just mild hyperbole to demonstrate the extent to which they agree with some point.
The question is, What is the substance of their agreement? What is the worth of their idea?
When an in-group comes to believe that their limited perspective represents the justification of an issue, it's called dominant privilege. In this case, the impression generated is that this person and people who enjoy his posts do not consider women important. Apparently, it's more important to crack jokes than it is important to understand the reality of the evil inflicted on actual women.
When a gang of teenagers sets fire to a homeless man, that is not "intellectual inbreeding." When respected religious leaders compare women in modern clothing to leaving meat on the table for cats, actually blaming victims for the crime, that is not "intellectual inbreeding." Intellectual inbreeding may have led to the mistaken thoughts, but to tilt a can of gasoline, or to speak, is an action with consequences. Misogyny is not simply an opinion, but a voice, and one which must expect to be met with other voices.
In short, the idea that someone is justified in saying any old thing is consistent with the belief that others are entitled to respond as they feel. The argument does not encompass, and does not address, whose words are better, or worse, for whatever purpose our lives are aimed toward. We may not agree, completely, as to what makes the world a better or worse place, but I think there is little arguing with the general knowledge of the facts of which I am speaking, nor do I think it's unfair to any person, for me to state: I think a world which is more hostile to women, which creates divisions and hate between men and women, which harms innocent people, is a worse place.
I am distant enough from his view points that I find his words distasteful, but I'm not ready to declare that he "makes the world a worse place."
Not by himself, no. But neither is he excused by being one of legions.