Treebore said:
Actually Bendris, the whole thing is relevant. We have a guy posting because he feels guilty about rolling exceptionally good stats. then a bunch of you tell him how he should feel guilty. Some actually tell him it is OK. There is something terribly wrong with that picture and most of you appear to be oblivious to it.
Alright, see, you seem a tad confused. All anyone has said is that if you are going to use dice, than it is
inevitable that some times you get low stats across the board and that some times you get high stats across the board. And, as a result, you will get characters that are naturally more powerful than others at lower levels and, with more viable options available, potentially more powerful than others at higher levels.
If the GM creates a system where every PC gets a stat between 15 and 18, before Racial Adjustments, than more power to them. In such a system, the PCs are
guaranteed to be fairly close to one another in regards to base effectiveness and viable options. Point Buy makes high stats possible by causing low stats. A Standard Array gives the same base Ability Score rolls to
every PC.
No one's trying to make the original poster feel
guilty about it; we're just pointing out that he either accepts the resulting rolls as a consequence of using dice (i.e., "it's okay") or that he seek a solution to his "delima" by using a system that reduces the potential variance between PCs.
This is a game. Why should a DM be able to tell anyone to do anything that they do not want to do?
And this relates to the topic how?
I think it is simple, the DM lets me create a character I will be happy to play, and I let she/him run their campaign the way they want to and are presumeably happy with. Sounds fair to me.
In a Ramones-esque Do-It-My-Way-Or-Else kinda way, yes, I guess that would seem fair.
As in any game group, if we find we can't play well together, we go our separate ways. Sounds reasonable and mature to me.
Again, this has
what to do with the topic? Yes, it's true, but relevant
how?
When a game gets to a point where people feel guilty about having an exceptionally good character, and then others essentially tell him yes, you should feel bad; then others essentially tell him it is OK; there is something very wrong with that.
Again, here you are once more confusing our statements about dice being random as statements about the original poster being a bad boy and not deserving a cookie.
Well I tell him good for you! Go kick some butt and take as many names as you can! Have fun! Have a blast! Enjoy feeling like you are a kick butt adventurer!
Absolutely!!!
Oh, quick question: What if his high stats allow him to outshine the rest of the PCs and their fun is impacted by this. Is that okay too? Because it
is a consequence of using dice, and you either accept it or you don't.