payn
Glory to Marik
Which is nice and why I like bounded accuracy. Id still like to see a more MAD design over all in D&D though.5E is not one of those editions. I ran a monk whose highest stat was 11, and did fairly well.
Which is nice and why I like bounded accuracy. Id still like to see a more MAD design over all in D&D though.5E is not one of those editions. I ran a monk whose highest stat was 11, and did fairly well.
A stupid Wizard is called a Sorcerer.This is excellent. I've been thinking along the same lines myself. I believe intelligence and charisma and wisdom are all bad to have as character scores the way they are because they restrict roleplaying. What if I want to play a stupid wizard?
This is actually covered in the 2024 Player's Handbook on page 14.For social skills, if you can explain another attribute, why not? Example interrogation/intimidation: strength (I break something in front of the target) or constitution (I'm large in stature) or even wisdom or intelligence (tricking the other person into slipping up and revealing information)
Player's Handbook said:In some situations, the DM might allow you to apply your skill proficiency to a different ability check. For example, if a character tries to intimidate someone through a show of physical strength, the DM might as for a Strength (Intimidation) check rather than a Charisma (Intimidation) check.
For social skills, if you can explain another attribute, why not? Example interrogation/intimidation: strength (I break something in front of the target) or constitution (I'm large in stature) or even wisdom or intelligence (tricking the other person into slipping up and revealing information)