RigaMortus2
First Post
Why are Rings of Protection twice the cost of Bracers of Armor? Is it because one is a deflection bonus and the other is armor bonus?
Nail said:Yep.
Deflection bonuses are better, as it applies to things like touch and flat-footed AC.
Indeed you have been. In the example above, it's not a "magical bonus", it's an armor bonus. It doesn't really matter what the source is, it's the bonus type that you have to be aware of.Nac_Mac_Feegle said:Take bracers of armour, they are only a pair of bracers, but they can give +8 armour, so against a touch attack, where platemail wouldnt help, we have always rules bracers of armour would, because its a magical bonus.
Have we been doing this completely wrong?
No - a deflection bonus still applies when you're flatfooted.So are we saying that flat footed (no dex bonus) you would also lose any deflection dependent magial bonus (ring of protection).
That's correct.And against touch attacks, you would lose any magical armour bonus (from bracers of armour)?
All of it - you lose your armor bonus and the armor's related enhancement bonus (the +3).Also, if that correct, if you were wearing +3 plate, and were targetted by a touch attack, would you lose only the armour bonus of the platemail, or the platemail, and all its other proporties eg. the +3
Patryn of Elvenshae said:Also, a ring of protection will stack with normal armor. Bracers of armor don't.
Rhun said:Patryn, can you point me to where it says this? I know bracers didn't stack with armor in 1st/2nd edition, but I have never been able to find where it says this in 3.X.