Quasqueton
First Post
TMNT.Cricket!? Nobody understands cricket. You gotta know what a crumpet is, to understand cricket!
Just so you know at least one person got it.
Quasqueton
TMNT.Cricket!? Nobody understands cricket. You gotta know what a crumpet is, to understand cricket!
ciaran00 said:Sorry, "Samwise" is not only a terrible name, it's a terrible character. Nothing interesting or unique about him, except maybe that he's not really unique or interesting at all.
BelenUmeria said:Well, I agree and disagree with you. I totally disagree that a barb looking for the next fight is a valid character. Why? Because it ruins the game for everyone else. If combat is a person's only joy, then play a computer game! I have seen intended RP encounters destroyed because people were too quick to rush into combat and this is no fun at all.
Now, can co,bat include RP? Yep. However, 3e limits a lot of cinematic moments by describing or having rules for every action under the sun. In fact, most players seem to say "I bull rush," rather than "I charge the villain, shoulder lowered, and ready to knock him away from my friend."
Combat can be a lot of fun and very cinematic, but it should not be an excuse for players to talk every now and again.
hong said:Are you trying to STEAL MY SCHTICK?
Is this another violence thing?
Dark Jezter said:Hear ye, hear ye!
From now on, all D&D campaigns that are low-combat heavy-roleplaying shall be known as "tea parties". As opposed to "hack & slash", which is the most common term used to describe heavy-combat low-roleplaying campaigns.![]()
Umbran said:Wasn't it fashionable to beat hong with a shtick? *whack!*![]()
Dark Jezter said:Hear ye, hear ye!
From now on, all D&D campaigns that are low-combat heavy-roleplaying shall be known as "tea parties". As opposed to "hack & slash", which is the most common term used to describe heavy-combat low-roleplaying campaigns.![]()
Quasqueton said:TMNT.
Just so you know at least one person got it.