Grazzt said:
Uh- how do you know the designers would've quit? The economy sucks and WotC like a lot of other companies downsized to save costs. Happens all the time (especially the last couple of years).
[qb]
And I don't think management at WotC is quite like it was during the TSR days...at least from the peeps I know that still work there. [/B]
MEG Hal said:Sounds fun but:
1) Would not move
2) Should I leave my job just to be "released" later
Art Director would of been great when Todd L, Sam Wood and WAR et al where there now it would just be cool.
Drakron said:
I dont like WotC under Hasbro, I left FR because of how WotC was handeling it (in all aspects) and I even have less consideration after the things they done in the "revised" 3rd edition were they come out and LIED to us saying we could still use non revised 3rd edition books and how they were cross compatible.
Drakron said:Lets see ... can you use D&DG as it written in 3.5?
MotP?
Can you run WotC 3.0 adventure modules in 3.5 without having to correct all NPCs stats?
They altered the pit fiend so much that any adventures that featured a pit fiend have to be re-evaluated, meaning that only thing that is left is the maps and the plot.
MeepoTheMighty said:
Huh? How on earth did they lie to you?
Grazzt said:
Apparently because 3.5 (at least what has been shown) has a lot of peeps up in arms thinking that 3.0 is not compatible.....just have to wait and see.