JoeGKushner said:And for RPG.net, as much as I love that place, they are sticklers for vocalizing their distast of mainstream (i.e. WoTC d20) material so I'm surprised. Unless of course we're talking vs. Monsters then the indie nature of it might cause people to leap up and go , "Ah, the cool!".
But I'm grossly generalizing there.
trancejeremy said:Well, bear in mind, the people who post on their forums are not necessarily the people who read the reviews. While ENWorld doesn't put a counter on their reviews, other sites do, and RPG.net pretty much dwarfs all others when it comes to page views of reviews.
Here is my POV, mostly specific to myself.philreed said:I'm not sure if reviews would help. From what I can tell reviews rarely have a measurable impact on sales. In fact, there's only one reviewer that I saw a definite spike in sales when his review posted. Additionally, the few other times I've seen a slight increase were from reviews posted at RPG.net.
Glyfair said:Reviews aren't very useful either. ENWorld stopped meeting my needs ages ago (probably because I find navigating the current pages time consuming and not as user friendly as it used to be).

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.