Shield magic mod question.

Bob5th

First Post
Compare Animated from the DM's guide with dancing from Sword and Fist.

Both alow you to lose your shield and let it defend you on it's own.

Animated: No time limit. No size limit. No prof required. +2 modifier

Dancing: Time limit. Size limit. Prof required. +3 modifier

As you can see there seems to be a slight problem with this. Animated is in every way superior and costs less. IMC I'll either be changing dancing to +1 or animated to +4. Most likely animated to 4.


P.S. Anyone else love dragon "slaying" arrows in 3E. They die unless they make a Fort save of 20. Might work well on Wyrmlings but for other dragons who happen to have a plus 50 or so to their Fort save they're useless.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

ooooh get the greater arrow of slaying for DC 23, personally I think they should do some additional dmg for those that make the save ... (is that finger of death? or slay living? ... or was that 2e)
 

Oops: I thought you were talking about weapons, not shields, sorry.

The Slaying arrows are nowhere as good as they were in previous editions, but they were too good back then.

Geoff.
 
Last edited:

Animated

Upon command, an animated shield floats within 2 feet of the wielder, protecting her as if she were using it herself but freeing
up both her hands. Only one shield can protect a character at a time.

Caster Level: 12th; Prerequisites: Craft Magic Arms and Armor, animate objects; Market Price: +2 bonus.
 


Wolf72 said:
ooooh get the greater arrow of slaying for DC 23, personally I think they should do some additional dmg for those that make the save ... (is that finger of death? or slay living? ... or was that 2e)

finger of death
 



I must admit that I really dislike the Dancing shield to begin with--there's enough time limited effects and various bonus types to deal with already.

However, the dancing shield has a few advantages over an animated one:

It provides a cover bonus against one opponent. This has several benefits: it adds to touch AC. It stacks with another shield since it is no longer an armor bonus. (The text specifies that only one dancing shield may protect a character at once).

Is that worth a standard action and a +4 equivalent bonus. I don't think so. But I don't like the idea of shields that sometimes provide cover bonusses and sometimes provide armor bonusses either.
 

Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top