NiTessine said:
Arnwyn, apparently you and I have a slightly differing idea of the term 'detailed'.
Maybe. But I think expecting a certain level of "detail" is patently unrealistic.
A Western Heartlands sourcebook would not only revisit, update and detail the region and its recent events, but also compile the information into a single, more easily referenced source.
Other than the "detail" part, everything else that you mention, especially "revisit" and "compile" has no value to me. I prefer books with value-added content.
The detail part is good - I too am a "detail person", and would love 11 pages (as Staffan notes, above) on Baldur's Gate as well. However, I do not value that anywhere near as much as detail on places
that have never seen any detail ever before.
In addition... Is there really a place on Faerûn that we haven't seen detailed at some point? I think Lapaliiya, Tashalar, Samarach and Thindol are the only ones that haven't been gone over in a sourcebook of their own. The Shaar, too, maybe. I'm not too sure where it falls between Old Empires and Shining South.
Of course there are areas we haven't seen detailed. Along with the ones you mentioned, there is also Lantan, Nimbral, the Mhair Jungles, and Sossal.
Now, they have yet to announce a content list for either
Serpent Kingdoms or the new
Shining South, so guessing what might be in them is purely conjecture. If we're REALLY lucky, we'll see Lapaliiya, Tashalar, Samarach, Thindol, and Mhair in the
Serpent Kingdoms, and the Shaar in the
Shining South book. (If this is true, I'd be jumping for joy.)
After all that (and an Island Kingdoms book), I'd gleefully ask for a Western Heartlands book. But right now? Hell, no.
In any case, there's only so much you can do before you have to revisit the old haunts, especially when you're laying off adventures.
Exactly. I'm hoping that WotC details the last areas we haven't seen yet - then I'm all for something like a Western Heartlands book.
Staffan said:
The stuff in the FRCS and 2e FR box doesn't count.
Um-hmmm....

I'll note that you also forgot to mention the (rather large) entry in
Volo's Guide to the Sword Coast for Baldur's Gate.
And the Western Heartlands has never gotten a proper sourcebook. It's one of the more well-detailed areas in the core sets, but that doesn't compare to a proper sourcebook. By comparison, the North has gotten at least three...
And, I'll make an interesting note here - the North has gotten at least 3 books
full of regurgitation. If you think that the North has much more detail than what was in those previous books (other than Silverymoon), you are mistaken. It's the same paragraphs for the same geographical features over and over and over again (eg. FR5, VGttN, The North box, etc). So, don't be thinking that "more pages = more detail", because you'd be wrong. The Western Heartlands has almost the same amount of detail (check the paragraph size for the geographical entries in each book) - just regurgitated fewer times.
However: I, too, would like Baldur's Gate treated the same way as Silverymoon was in
The Silver Marches.
Heretic Apostate said:
Don't forget Volo's Guide to Baldur's Gate, based on the Baldur's Gate computer game. That extensively covers Baldur's Gate, though I'm not sure how much of it is canonical.
Nope.
Volo's Guide to Baldur's Gate doesn't cover Baldur's Gate at all. Instead, it covers the region south of Baldur's Gate in western Amn and northern Tethyr.