What specifically are you talking about?
I don't like damage on a miss which is a 4th edition element. What two handed specific option do I have to replace it?
What specifically are you talking about?
Then you end up with a game very open to accusations of "not D&D". It doesn't have to be the best RPG on the market, it just has to be a good version of D&D. Time will tell on how the fanbase accepts it. It is to 4E for me so I will likely pass and stick with retroclones and Pathfinder and a bit of AD&D on occasion.
I don't like damage on a miss which is a 4th edition element. What two handed specific option do I have to replace it?
Which parts of D&D Next do you not like?
to many 4Eisms in the game etc.
This is what I'm talking about. Part of the reason you don't like the game is because it contains elements from a game you don't like.
That and it is missing parts I do like such as proper vancian casting. Not sure if you are trying to score points or whatever but I am more likely to go and buy a clone/PF over D&DN if it has to many elements of stuff I do not like in it.
This is what I'm talking about. Part of the reason you don't like the game is because it contains elements from a game you don't like.
It's not about scoring points. It's about point out how "not such a good idea" Next is with regards of trying to bring elements from multiple editions into one game.
If there is a certain game you like that Next is trying to emulate then why wouldn't you just play the original? That way, you can have the game you like without having to sift through another game until you find what you like.
Even if they started building 5e from scratch it could still have elements from a game you don't like (whether that game is 4e or something else you don't like). I am not sure how your approach solves this particular issue.