Should PCs Be Exceptional?

Do You Think PCs Should Be Exceptional?

  • No, PCs should be typical for the setting who do exceptional things.

    Votes: 7 14.3%
  • PCs should start out as typical and then become exceptional.

    Votes: 13 26.5%
  • Yes, PCs should be exceptional from the beginning.

    Votes: 17 34.7%
  • I am exceptional and not subject to your limited choices.

    Votes: 12 24.5%


log in or register to remove this ad

An alternative way to ask this question is to ask when a PC should be considered exceptional.

- At the time of character creation. PCs are inherently special. (e.g. most PbtA, most superhero games)

- Not at the very beginning (Level 1), but reasonably quickly after they've been around the block a couple of times (Level 7ish). (e.g. D&D 5E).

- Not until they've done some serious growth and powered up a lot (Level 15ish). (e.g. D&D 3E, most WEG d6 games)

- Never inherently by beefed up numbers on a character sheet; only when they manage to do exceptional things. (e.g. Zweihander, Dread).

- Lemon curry. (e.g. Free Kriegsspiel)

--

My preference is for option #3 above. I also can enjoy #2 and #4. I have pretty low interest in #1 and #5.
 

Anyway, what do folks think is the more important lesson to impart?

1. Some people are just born special.
2. With effort, you can make yourself into whatever you want.
Both at once.

And it's done by having randomly-generated stats - those who are "born special" have higher stats across the board than the average and quite possibly higher stats then their PC peers.

And then the "make something out of it" piece comes in. You can have the highest stats you want but if you die in your second combat then they didn't matter much, did they? Meanwhile, the underdog PC who started with very bland stats might just keep chuggin' along and make himself into something quite special indeed.
 

An alternative way to ask this question is to ask when a PC should be considered exceptional.

- At the time of character creation. PCs are inherently special. (e.g. most PbtA, most superhero games)

- Not at the very beginning (Level 1), but reasonably quickly after they've been around the block a couple of times (Level 7ish). (e.g. D&D 5E).

- Not until they've done some serious growth and powered up a lot (Level 15ish). (e.g. D&D 3E, most WEG d6 games)

- Never inherently by beefed up numbers on a character sheet; only when they manage to do exceptional things. (e.g. Zweihander, Dread).

- Lemon curry. (e.g. Free Kriegsspiel)

--

My preference is for option #3 above. I also can enjoy #2 and #4. I have pretty low interest in #1 and #5.
I'd go with the third one on that list - if they do have to be or become special, at least put it off until they've earned it. :)
 

Both at once.

And it's done by having randomly-generated stats - those who are "born special" have higher stats across the board than the average and quite possibly higher stats then their PC peers.

And then the "make something out of it" piece comes in. You can have the highest stats you want but if you die in your second combat then they didn't matter much, did they? Meanwhile, the underdog PC who started with very bland stats might just keep chuggin' along and make himself into something quite special indeed.
The old classic. High stats lead to overconfidence, lead to death.
 

For games where the PCs' occupation is "adventurer," I like the idea that the PCs are not exceptionally gifted, they're exceptionally foolish. Adventuring is dangerous business, and while in principle any old farmer could try to be an adventurer, most farmers are sane enough to recognize that adventures often end in death. The ones who don't recognize that are usually dead. The PCs are the ones who were crazy enough to try and lucky enough to survive.
 

Remove ads

Top