https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope
First off, the odds of that are only slightly greater than 0. Not worth mentioning. It get even more ludicrous when you add in 6 int, 8 int, 10 int, 12 int, 14 int, 16 int, and 18 int. All of those have to have no double proficiency people as well. Your argument is bupkis because it relies on something that is almost, but not quite statistically impossible.
And again with the nearly impossible. You'd have better luck winning the lottery 10 times in a row than for someone to roll that badly thousands and thousands of times, or well in the case of the silly argument that novel Holmes just rolled well every time for his whole life.
Do you have a reasonable argument to put forth?