...
Frankly, KaeYoss, this is getting old. In nearly every FR suppliment that talks about Sun Elves (dating clear back to 1st edition), it describes the typical sun elf attitude as being arrogant and prejudiced against other races. I have no idea where you are getting the impression that most sun elves are kind, decent people and only a few of them are rascist.
I see you want to cling to your opinion that all sun elves (or the vast majority of) are racist. IMO that theory is wrong, and as long as you don't give me a (preferably current) source that states something like "the (vast) majority of sun elves are racist", I won't change that opinion.
Gez said:
1. It can't be racism unless the cat-lover is a cat himself.
2. Being a cat-lover don't means thinking cats are better than dogs. It just means loving them. (Not even necessarily more. You can be a cat-lover and a dog-lover too. But you can't say your kin is better than the other and say you're not racist.)
"Patriotism" would be prefering their culture to the others (which is normal). But preference don't mean assumption of superiority.
Word play. "I prefer my race/culture/nation to others" and "I think my race/culture/nation is the best there is" is more or less the same.
But patriotism/racism has always been a double standard: Some can praise their own race/culture/nation all time, waving their flat, putting their colors everywhere and refuse to get any influence from other races/cultures/nations and they call it patriotism. Others do so but eveyone calls them racists.
Myself, I'm annoyed by two things in what I call the "melnazibonelf syndrom".
It's always interesting how fast the term "nazi" will come up.
I see the other quite often: Elves are bashed no matter what. In 3.5 for example, they got nothing (or nearly nothing, they get both longsword and rapier where they got only one before - not a big deal and something that many have done anyway), while other races - especially the dwarves - got quite a good package, but you don't get people wound up because of that.
Saeviomagy said:
Which is not what 'racial memory' means. What you refer to is commonly known as 'historical records'.
Not just historical records. It's also oral tradition
1. Races in the real world certainly aren't nationalities, they tend to be groups of people who trace their heritage back to a particular location, and therefore bloodline of humanity. Usually it just ends up being 'anyone who looks different is a different race' however.
Human races, however you might define them, are still the same thing: Humans. They are no significant differences.
2. Races in D&D are clearly defined - elves, dwarves, humans, halflings, orcs are all seperate races. Their heritage is unknown - perhaps they are all as closely related as human races are.
Their heritage isn't unknown. Don't forget that in D&D (especially FR, which is what we talk about here), the gods are very real and take a direct interest in their worshippers. While you can debate all day about the truth behind the Adam-and-Eve story, in D&D it is not just belief that elves were first born from drops of blood shed by corellon, it's truth. And they aren't closely related at all. They are different species.
3. Your 'cats vs dogs' argument might possibly hold water if cats and dogs were classified as races in either of the settings we discuss. They're not, so it doesn't.
What are cats and dogs, if not races. If with races you mean species (Star Wars d20 uses that term, for example), cats are a species alright. As are dogs. As are elves, dwarves, halflings......
4. Furthermore in order for your 'cats vs dogs' argument to work, the cat lover would have to be actively discriminating. If, for instance, he couldn't stand having dogs on his property for no other reason than the fact that they're dogs, and he took specific measures against dogs to prevent them from coming on his property, and he let cats freely enter his property simply because they're cats, then he would be said to be specist.
There are a lot of people doing exactly that: They forbid dogs on their lawn, but don't mind about cats. I wouldn't go as far as call them speciesist, and many of them like dogs - they just not want them on their property.
Do my eyes decieve me, or did you just say "participating in racial discrimination doesn't make someone a racist"
No. But I do say that barring your homeland and retreat from the world to other races is not racist.