• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

So what's YOUR world's 'hook'?

A Tainted World

Centuries ago, a cabal of powerful wizards performed an exotic ritual to further enhance the powers of all arcane casters. But something went terribly wrong, and the entire arcane spell pool became tainted, instantly killing or corrupting all arcane casters and turning items created by arcane magic into cursed items. So horrific was this Taint that those affected by it sporadically channeled corrupt energy causing those around them to die, become tainted themselves, or mutate into aberrations or magical beasts.

The largest churches raised great armies and battled against the growing army of tainted creatures. But the losses were terrible, and only a handful of their forces survived. The smaller churches which had not sent as many forces found themselves thrust into positions of power, and they quickly moved to occupy the political voids created by the great war. A period of widespread religious crusades followed, with each church trying to wipe out opposing ones. Today, only a handful of powerful churches remain.

New generations of arcane casters rose up and some of them became tainted as well. Thus, the churches created special forces, known as Witchhunters, to hunt them down before they could do much damage. The witchhunters are also responsible for finding and destroying items crafted by arcane magic. Recent items created by divine power now bear a special magical mark (viewable under detect magic) to identify them which can not be duplicated in arcane items. Any item not bearing this divine mark is illegal, and must be destroyed.

The players begin here, in a world where arcane magic is truly dangerous, powerful churches rule the land, magic items are much rarer than normal, and some items they find may be illegal to possess. Special campaign rules for PC arcane casters are in place, since they face tremendous adversity here.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I just wanted to pipe in and comment on how original many of these ideas are. Sorry I don't have anything to contribute (not playing now - too much real life) but it has been great reading everyone's ideas and imaginations!

:D
 

Kalendraf said:
<snip lots of good stuff>

The players begin here, in a world where arcane magic is truly dangerous, powerful churches rule the land, magic items are much rarer than normal, and some items they find may be illegal to possess. Special campaign rules for PC arcane casters are in place, since they face tremendous adversity here.

Any chance you'd be willing to share those campaign rules?

And to echo myrdden, lots of great and inspirational ideas here. Keep 'em coming.
At the time I don't have anything to contribute, since I'm only running a Midnight PbP campaign (although some Warhammer Fantasy RPG and/or CoC elements are set to crop up in the campaign sometime in the future).
 


Mine is pure and simple.

It's best expressed in a series of pictures, though:

tn_ffcolr77_jpg.jpg
tn_frank_frazetta_cornered_jpg.jpg
tn_frank_frazetta_swampgod_jpg.jpg
tn_frank_frazetta_themammoth_jpg.jpg
 

barsoomcore said:
I'm not sure how you meant this, but I just want to say that dissing people's campaigns is kind of uncool. People work really hard on their campaigns and have every reason to feel proud, and just because it reminds you of another setting is no reason to accuse them of being uncreative.

Maybe you didn't mean that, in which case I apologize for my outburst. Pay me no mind. I just know how I'd feel if someone trashed my precious campaign.
Dude! You know exactly how I feel!
 

D+1 said:
That is an inherent contradiction - a patent impossibility. Lawful good - by definition - is not oppressive.

Are you kidding? It can certainly be oppresive, no matter how you define LG.

LG by one definition would be a "Ned Flanders rules the world" kind of oppressive, where niceness is legislated and anything even remotely dangerous or bad for you is forbidden.

LG by another definition could easily mean the Ayatollah or the Taliban. Or even a Pat-Robertson American Theocracy, where only one religion is permitted because its the "good" one, and where we put certain minorities into camps because they're "evil sinners" and we're "good".

Nisarg
 

Insight said:
So, to open up the discussion a bit more, perhaps a society is not based on the moral good (as defined by the campaign setting). A Lawful Good regime in power could definitely oppress such a culture. Even if the regime's intent is good, its methods may not be, and that is where the oppression comes in.

A LG society in the extreme could theoreticallÿ:

Outlaw all alcohol, tobacco, and drugs beause they're harmful
outlaw fatty foods for the same reason
outlaw chocolate too, and other candies, because they rot your teeth
outlaw any kind of pornography or sexually suggestive images because they are degrading to women
make it illegal to spank a child or discipline children in any way, or hell take it to the next step and just take children from their parents at birth because only the state can be trusted to raise good citizens
ban any form of weapons
ban any music with "controversial" lyrics or lyrics that might be seen as offensive to anyone
ban any books that are likewise controversial or potentially hurtful to people's feelings
outlaw littering, and restrict the amount of water you can use in a bath, for environmental reasons.
make any kind of speech against the state illegal, because the state is, of course, good.
enforce worship in a certain "good" religion, and outlaw the bad ones; or outlaw religion altogether because it causes "prejudice".

Punishments for most of these crimes would be re-education.

Personally, out of any possible oppresive regime, the LG oppresive regime is one of the ones I'd LEAST want to live in. Its the nanny state.

But hey, I'm funny that way.. one of the cheif reasons I left everything I had in Canada and moved to South America was because here in Uruguay I can peacefully smoke my pipe in a restaurant. Something that is considered a thought crime in the increasingly nanny-statist north america.

Nisarg
 

Nisarg said:
It can certainly be oppresive, no matter how you define LG.

This is exactly the discussion my fellow gamers and I had a couple of weeks ago.

The world we play in is at least partially controlled by a LG sect of the state church. These are not nice guys. Very Inquisition-like. But they believe they are doing the work of the church and protecting the kingdom from heretics. We were kind of wondering what it makes us if we sorta killed a bunch of them, more or less accidentally...


J.
 

Nisarg said:
LG by one definition would be a "Ned Flanders rules the world" kind of oppressive, where niceness is legislated and anything even remotely dangerous or bad for you is forbidden.
So, a place like San Angeles from the movie Demolition Man? I'd say you're equating Lawful as regards alignment with the laws of legislation when they are merely related. Each affects the other but one does not equal or dictate the other. A place such as you describe might CLAIM to be LG, might even start out LG, but in fact is not. Being "Good" and "Lawful" as regards alignment means knowing what the right thing is and doing it BECAUSE it is right, not doing what is ostensibly "right" only because you are being coerced.
LG by another definition could easily mean the Ayatollah or the Taliban.
A good example of just what I was talking about. They might claim to be LG in alignment terms but CLEARLY are not. Those are eminent examples of LE - conform or die. A LG society, a LG government; they are LG because they WANT to be LG, not because they are forced to be.
Or even a Pat-Robertson American Theocracy, where only one religion is permitted because its the "good" one, and where we put certain minorities into camps because they're "evil sinners" and we're "good".
Pat Robertson, while I will HEARTILY agree is a horrible candidate for leader of just about any country, to my knowledge has never, EVER advocated anything even remotely resembling a theocracy. And I would suggest the topic drift no further than that into real-world religion lest the flames ignite and the thread be locked.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top