Somebodies got PHB3!

About Avatar: I only saw the movie today, and I didn't see the reference to the aliens not being mammalian - and neither did my friends there.

Where is it?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Hehe, when you think how freely D&D violates most any other science, even those were handwaving it with "It's magic" still makes no sense, this insistence on biological correctness (and I am not talking just about boobs here) is downright weird.
Even in the real world biological correctness doesn't mean much when you look at a creature like the platypus. It's a mammal that has venom, lays eggs, has mammary glands, but no teats. After looking at a platypus I have no problem believing that a Dragonborn female has boobs. Not that I ever really care to begin with.

@blargney the second,
The Skill power feat gives you a Skill power. So at the cost of a feat you get an extra utility power based on your skills.
 

About Avatar: I only saw the movie today, and I didn't see the reference to the aliens not being mammalian - and neither did my friends there.

Where is it?

I didn't see the reference either. They even have helpless young which, to me, would be an indication that they would probably breast feed.
 

@blargney the second,
The Skill power feat gives you a Skill power. So at the cost of a feat you get an extra utility power based on your skills.
Yeah, I read that part upthread. I'm definitely interested in taking it and now want to know what requirements are going to prevent me from doing so. Any prereqs or restrictions on the feat?
 

Yeah, I read that part upthread. I'm definitely interested in taking it and now want to know what requirements are going to prevent me from doing so. Any prereqs or restrictions on the feat?

From what I read, on that RPG website, you have to chose a power that is associated with a skill you have and of your level or lower. That is just an educated guess based on the information from that site.
 


I didn't have to read this entire thread. Your statement sum it up in a nutshell.

Ya'll need to take a break...and step back from this. And realize someone's written creative and wildly imagination on a fantasy species...is just pure imagination.

Look at you...yes you, grown up and all. Cackling like pre-teens acting like their 1st visit to a nudity-bar.

For shame...yes, and don't hide behind your monitor.

I.
see.
you.



:devil:

Now...we return to the main topic at hand.

:D
Man, this thread is taking a weirder and weirder turn. Discussing the finer points of voluptuous women being built like brick houses (which may or may not be a complement), and now people basically saying "I like breasts on things," citing James Cameron's personal fetish fuel like chapter and verse.

Breasts on dragons (and maybe crystal golems) is kind of dumb like beards on dwarf women is kind of dumb. But, hell, if Rule 34 of the Internet can become Rule 34 of D&D, I don't really care. It doesn't make ME dumb. It just makes the artists/designers/people who emphasize the fact that their nonmammal has bewbs dumb.

I don't really even care if the dragonpeople IMC have bewbs or not. It's not really something I'm going to spend much time on, other than to note that it's kind of dumb, but whatever.

D&D has owlbears. D&D can stomach a few things that are kind of dumb. If breasts on a dragonperson are very important to your way of having fun, well, whatever, roll that d20, I don't care.
 
Last edited:

(ignoring the anatomy aspects of these posts and this thread is less than half it's size :p )
But I'm still posting to say thanks for C.W.Richeson (@rpgnet, and also who posted here in this same thread under the same username) for taking the time to answer people's questions even when some of those questions were clearly from people too lazy to read earlier in that same thread when the question was already answered :D
 



Remove ads

Top