Bauglir said:Because they are. I've played with dms who just randomly overrule things because 'they don't make sense' and it's not much fun.
So stop arguing and start playing.
Bauglir said:Because they are. I've played with dms who just randomly overrule things because 'they don't make sense' and it's not much fun.
Black Omega said:But using the arrows created by Flame Arrow with a Frost bow, IMHO, is a different thing. The arrow is on fire when it's picked up, then shot. When it's fired, frost is imbued into the arrow. I can easily see these effects canceling.
Black Omega said:You really wouldn't let a flaming sword set something on fire? A shocking sword wouldn't zap the person carrying it if they dived into a lake?
The electricity does not harm the wielder.
Black Omega said:A shocking sword wouldn't zap the person carrying it if they dived into a lake?
Keep in mind...the basic weapon properties (acid, flaming, frost, lightning, sonic) all require a command word to activate (standard action), and a weapon with multiple properties might well have multiple command words.
Gort said:Yeah, I wouldn't allow it either. Makes very little sense to me. It's either hot, or it's cold. Can't be both.
But the "blackfire" or whatever doing 2d6 cold damage would be fine by me.
The silly thing is saying it can be both hot & cold at the same time. Only on the Rules forum would such a thing be considered IMNSHO.![]()
Benben said:niteshade6 and the other nay sayers,
What about the other elemental enchantments sonic, acid, or lightning would you let them stack on a single weapon?