Star Wars: Was the “other Skywalker” Yoda spoke of really Leia?

At the time Yoda said that, Leia was the only other "skywalker" out there.

And since Leia was not yet married to Han Solo, and was not expecting any children, the idea Yoda was talking about a future force-sensitive user....

...Unless that person was "Baby Yoda" from the TV show "The Mandalorian".

To think Yoda was referencing the offspring of Emperor Palpatine... I don't think so.
Well, except for Anakin Skywalker, who was only dead “from a certain point of view.”

Yoda could see into the future through the Force, using Force vision, so I don’t think future Skywalkers are entirely out.

I think we all know by now <SPOILER!> what last name/title? Rey ended up taking.

And why not Baby Yoda? Maybe he becomes a “Skywalker” too.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Remember the actual quote:

Obi-Wan: "That boy is our last hope."
Yoda: "No...there is another..."

There are very few words there, so you can probably interpret them to mean... anything you want.
I want to interpret them to mean Leia because I think that’s clearly the intent, but it always felt cheap to me that it was always just a plot device for Luke, and thereby Vader, to discover he had a sister, so Vader could taunt him, almost turn him to the dark side, and be thrashed nearly to death. I mean, the chain of events is fine, but it feels contrived if Leia never actually ends up developing her power. So my question is really about whether this can be reconciled with the new trilogy or a similar story, because IMO Disney really dropped the ball in not wrapping up a major loose thread that was left by the OT, unless I’m missing something. (I still haven’t seen the new movie and probably won’t for a while.)
 

The point was that Luke wasn't their last hope - there was someone else who could take his place if he failed.

But he didn't fail, so Leia didn't need to take his place, and could follow her own destiny instead.
Leia as little more than a back up plan is very unsatisfying to me. In the conversation Luke has with her about developing her power, he says, “In time, you will learn to use your power as I have,” but she never really does, not for any real purpose. It’s like Luke was completely full of it and maybe trying to make himself (or the audience) feel better for handing himself over to Vader by thinking that Yoda could just train up another Jedi. I mean, was that the whole point?
 

It wasn't Leia when it was said in 1980; it became that later.

So who knows? The words aren't explicit about a Skywalker, just another hope.

Now, Yoda when he dies in RotJ is the one who says "There is ... another ... Sky ... walk ... er. croak"
Right. Now, my question supposes the full context of Episodes V and VI, which includes not only what Yoda said as Luke ran off to Bespin, but also what he said on his deathbed (which I would’ve thought was obvious from the thread title). I’m assuming that Yoda is presented as somewhat rational and that the audience is expected to assume he’s speaking about the same person in both instances. But he never says, “Leia”. That bit of interpretation comes from Ben “from-a-certain-point-of-view” Kenobi, so I figured there was some room to finagle.
 

Right. Now, my question supposes the full context of Episodes V and VI, which includes not only what Yoda said as Luke ran off to Bespin, but also what he said on his deathbed (which I would’ve thought was obvious from the thread title). I’m assuming that Yoda is presented as somewhat rational and that the audience is expected to assume he’s speaking about the same person in both instances. But he never says, “Leia”. That bit of interpretation comes from Ben “from-a-certain-point-of-view” Kenobi, so I figured there was some room to finagle.

Well, in the context of RotJ, yes, it's obviously Leia. But in the context of ESB, knowing the OT was not written as a single planned trilogy but was improvised episode to episode, it could have meant anything ... and was only resolved to Leia when RotJ was final.

It works, but hey -- Yoda could have been talking about Ahsoka, or Ezra, or broom boy for all we know.
 

Yes, it was Leia. As Vader says... "Sister! So you have a twin sister! .... If you will not turn to the dark side, perhaps she will!"

I don’t know how that’s supposed to tell us definitively what Yoda meant. It was Obi-Wan that confirmed Luke’s suspicions, but this was the same guy that seems to have forgotten all about Leia when he said Luke was “our last hope”, even though he was present at the twins’ birth. Yoda wasn’t there to confirm that’s what he meant during Luke and Ben’s conversation, being dead and all. The strongest evidence we as an audience have for Leia being the “other Skywalker” are Luke’s feelings, which is compelling, but not entirely conclusive.
 

I have always been curious as to why, in both Legends and new canon, they chose not to develop Leia's connection with the Force to any great degree, instead choosing to make her primarily a stateswoman.
It’s like the movies held out this big plot-hook and did absolutely nothing with it. That was forgivable when the revelation was coming at the end of Episode VI, but there’ve now been three more movies and nothing ever came of Luke’s seemingly prescient statement that Leia would learn to use the Force as he had. For me, this is a let down.
 

Leia as little more than a back up plan is very unsatisfying to me. In the conversation Luke has with her about developing her power, he says, “In time, you will learn to use your power as I have,” but she never really does, not for any real purpose.
Because she chose not to. She had other things to do with her life.

It’s like Luke was completely full of it and maybe trying to make himself (or the audience) feel better for handing himself over to Vader by thinking that Yoda could just train up another Jedi. I mean, was that the whole point?
Certainly not. For one thing, Yoda was dead by then, and Force Ghost or not, I doubt Luke had any illusions that he was going to be training Leia from beyond the grave.

No, Luke simply meant that the strength and special capabilities Leia saw in him were also in her, and that he was confident that the Rebels wouldn't need his help in order to complete their mission, because they'd still have Leia with them. He's not treating her as a backup in that scene, he's saying that he himself is the redundant one in that scenario - they can complete the Shield Generator mission without him, so it's okay that he has to leave in order to confront and redeem Vader.
 

I have always been curious as to why, in both Legends and new canon, they chose not to develop Leia's connection with the Force to any great degree, instead choosing to make her primarily a stateswoman.
They do. She flies thorough space in TLJ, and she does stuff in TRoS. It's just that she's more focused on being a general. Spoiler box for TRoS, where her Jedi training is made very clear:
  • she's trained as a Jedi by Luke
  • has her own lightsaber
  • beats Luke in a lightsaber fight
  • she trains Rey
  • she projects her voice across the galaxy to Kylo
  • she disappears when she dies and becomes a force ghost
 
Last edited:


Remove ads

Top