Flyspeck23 said:This was an ENP project - TOGC did the layout because we can![]()
What was the phrase I used? "TOGC's undeniable industry leading card designing skills" or something along those lines? I stand by it!
Flyspeck23 said:This was an ENP project - TOGC did the layout because we can![]()
Morrus said:What was the phrase I used? "TOGC's undeniable industry leading card designing skills" or something along those lines? I stand by it!
Nailom said:Thanks for the Status Cards. I brought them to the gametable at monday and we made good use of em.
One thing I think you could do, to improve your product is to redesign the field on the top left of the cards. I would love to see the headline of the card repeatet in this box, so that when holding my spellcards in the hand like a deck of playing cards, I don't have to flip through them to grab the right card.
P.S. what about the item cards?
I am curious to know how these will differentiate from Paizo's Item Cards.Flyspeck23 said:Nailom said:P.S. what about the item cards?![]()
Coming soon.
![]()
No, really. This time I mean it![]()
Frukathka said:I am curious to know how these will differentiate from Paizo's Item Cards.
Ah. Thanks for the clarification.Flyspeck23 said:Totally? As in: another thing entirely.
No illustration. Instead they'll feature the item's game statistics and rules. Those cards are a visualization tool, which the CIC are not. If you know any of our card products, you've got a pretty good idea of where we're heading with the CIC.
Frukathka said:Ah. Thanks for the clarification.