Lord Pendragon
First Post
I'm currently playing a paladin with a 9 Int, and struggled for a bit trying to figure out how to show that he was slightly below average in intelligence, without falling into the "a negative Int bonus means an idiot" trap.
I finally decided to simply skew his logic a bit, since analysis and logic are two of the prime areas represented by D&D Int. For instance, a few sessions ago we came across a goblinoid which, upon seeing us, transformed into a fish and escaped into an underground stream. My paladin, seeing this, immediately jumped to the conclusion that he must have been a were-fish.
However, having an above average Wis (my paladin's is 15, but 12 will do,) means that you are able to recognize that you aren't the smartest guy, and are wise enough to listen to trusted companions/advisers who may be more knowledgeable. Thus, when my paladin described the encounter with the "were-fish" to his superiors, and they suggested that it probably had not been a were-fish, my paladin was wise enough to know they were probably right, and he was probably wrong.
I think it's a nice, simple way to show a somewhat-lower-than-normal intelligence, without forcing you to play a drooling idiot. Of course YMMV.
I finally decided to simply skew his logic a bit, since analysis and logic are two of the prime areas represented by D&D Int. For instance, a few sessions ago we came across a goblinoid which, upon seeing us, transformed into a fish and escaped into an underground stream. My paladin, seeing this, immediately jumped to the conclusion that he must have been a were-fish.
However, having an above average Wis (my paladin's is 15, but 12 will do,) means that you are able to recognize that you aren't the smartest guy, and are wise enough to listen to trusted companions/advisers who may be more knowledgeable. Thus, when my paladin described the encounter with the "were-fish" to his superiors, and they suggested that it probably had not been a were-fish, my paladin was wise enough to know they were probably right, and he was probably wrong.
I think it's a nice, simple way to show a somewhat-lower-than-normal intelligence, without forcing you to play a drooling idiot. Of course YMMV.