Sundering a Magic Weapon

[Seeten]

My monk has improved disarm and improved sunder. So we use it.

 

[Altamont Ravenard]

Ah, 3.0. Where swords were made of tissue paper.

In 3.5, it'd be Hardness 12, HP 15 (see PHB, p. 165; the DMG entry is incorrect). It's +2 Hardness & +10 HP/point of enhancement bonus. This is another reason to get swords made out of mithral or adamantine, and to buff up the enhancement bonus.

Brad

The funny thing is, I did get the info from the 3.5 SRD:

Hardness and Hit Points: An attacker cannot damage a magic weapon that has an enhancement bonus unless his own weapon has at least as high an enhancement bonus as the weapon or shield struck. Each +1 of enhancement bonus also adds 1 to the weapon’s or shield’s hardness and hit points.

Weird that my copy of the SRD has an error in it (can't be the only one though)

:\

AR

Edit: the SRD does state that a +1 to a shield add +2 to hardness and +10 hp, though...

 

[Len]

The funny thing is, I did get the info from the 3.5 SRD:

This was changed in the DMG Errata, to be the same as the rule for shields. It has not been changed in the SRD currently on wizards.com though.

 

[Quasqueton]

This was changed in the DMG Errata, to be the same as the rule for shields. It has not been changed in the SRD currently on wizards.com though.

Yay! I get to remove an item from my house rules list.

Quasqueton

 

[Imruphel]

(snip details of a DM who fails to keep the proper rein on his game) in my opinion sunder is broken!

Sure, that's your opinion but I've read a lot of your other posts and can only conclude that you and your group have only a very basic grasp of the rules of the game.

PS: I would never dream of attempting to correct your spelling/grammar/punctuation but try using "uber" instead of "ubber" if you want to seem a little less silly. Someone else will have to show you the proper German spelling.