Dark Psion
First Post
Now that I have seen Star Wars III, I was wondering, should General Grievious have been Darth Maul?
Darth Maul did have more "attached" body parts when we last saw him than Grievious does now. But more importantly, it would set up a rematch between Obi-wan and Maul.
The lack of power could be explained due the the lack of body parts. The Visual Dictonary of SW3 says Darth Vader cannot do Force Lightning because he has no living limbs, so a Maul that is mostly organs in a bag, would have limited force powers.
It would have made the battle between them much more personal, especially since they deleted the death of Jedi Shaak Ti at Grievious's hands.
It would also have tempted Obi-wan to the Dark side, and that would have created a contrast as he overcome the tempation, but Anakin sucumbs to the temptation.
Darth Maul did have more "attached" body parts when we last saw him than Grievious does now. But more importantly, it would set up a rematch between Obi-wan and Maul.
The lack of power could be explained due the the lack of body parts. The Visual Dictonary of SW3 says Darth Vader cannot do Force Lightning because he has no living limbs, so a Maul that is mostly organs in a bag, would have limited force powers.
It would have made the battle between them much more personal, especially since they deleted the death of Jedi Shaak Ti at Grievious's hands.
It would also have tempted Obi-wan to the Dark side, and that would have created a contrast as he overcome the tempation, but Anakin sucumbs to the temptation.