Talk about gibberish latin and nothing to do with the topic.

[MrFilthyIke]

Thanks! I appreciate the time you took to let me know your views on it.

Do you have examples of your work online? Even ones not related to BoEF?
I've always like how others alter photos, I'd love to see any work you have.

(This is not for perverted uses, I'm interested in Art, you trolls... )

 

[Grappik]

Do you have examples of your work online? Even ones not related to BoEF?
I've always like how others alter photos, I'd love to see any work you have.

(This is not for perverted uses, I'm interested in Art, you trolls... )

Unfortunately, no. I don't have any form of online portfolio. It's being worked on, but I am too picky to choose what to show.

 

[0-hr]

Honestly, I hate seeing anything photo-realistic in a fantasy (or even Sci-Fi game). I guess it just ruins the suspension of disbelief for me - like having really bad actors in a movie. I've only seen the preview pages, but they looked like more of the same - people in makeup worked over with Photoshop. I can't help but think "God, run a dry-brush filter over it at least..."

And Hong, that would have been funny at 10 lines. As it was, just a waste of bandwidth.

 

[tburdett]

Hong, learn some manners please -- it is rude to reply to someone's post in a language he or she does not understand (nor does 99% of the rest of the forum populace).

Your post was a waste of time and exceedingly without class - you are not succeeding at impressing anyone with that nonsense.

Just do a search and replace for every word in any response that he makes using the word 'blah' as the replacement. The content value remains the same.

The FLGS had been asked, apparently, by several people about the BoEF and the owner printed out the above and taped it up to forestall any additional requests. I just went online and used a cut and paste to add it here.

 

[hong]

And Hong, that would have been funny at 10 lines. As it was, just a waste of bandwidth.

10 lines of WANGERS? Good heavens.

 

[hong]

Just do a search and replace for every word in any response that he makes using the word 'blah' as the replacement. The content value remains the same.

Maaate! Get some of this into you:

 

[Morgenstern]

Hong,

Do you actually know that much latin, or can you point out the translating site you used so I can decode that into something a bit more... in English? It looks amusing from what latin I have, but I'm clearly missing out on the full joke.

 

[hong]

Hong,

Do you actually know that much latin, or can you point out the translating site you used so I can decode that into something a bit more... in English? It looks amusing from what latin I have, but I'm clearly missing out on the full joke.

http://www.lipsum.com/


Hong "explaining teh joek; -LXXXVI points" Ooi

 

[Tsyr]

Actually, I thought it was hillarious. Hong is one of our natural treasures here at EN World, and we should do our best to preserve him as such.

Does make me wish my latin was better, though.

What I thought was innane was the post he was mocking... Someone asked an opinion of the books art. Someone responded that their FLGS wouldn't carry it and cited innane laws to show why they were right not to. This post had absolutely nothing to do with the posters question *at all* except being about the same item. I would be like if I asked for a recipie for a steak marinade and someone posted a page-long rant on why they felt meat-eaters were evil.

Hong made fun of the law and the posting thereof.

Now, tell me, which was worse?

I have my own opinions on that, as I'm sure you do to.

 

[Tsyr]

Hmmm. That would explain why the few sentances I managed to translate at all made little sense