Knight Otu
First Post
Except that it doesn't say so, IMHO. It only talks about "no common laguage," not "no language at all." The "Speak with" spells make it clear that the subject can answer the same way, but Telepathy does notUmbran said:The couatl entry specifically mentions answering back because it allows critters to "speak" even if they don't normally have language (shared or otherwise). That's worth a special mention.
Your reading is that any creature addressed by telepathy can respond. The couatl entry says that the addressed creature can respond, even if it shares no language with the couatl. I do not think it would be worth a special mention if the default assumption would be that any creature addressed by telepathy would be able to respond.
Normally, I'd agree. But nothing in the telepathy text makes me think it should be two-way. You can communicate with someone without using the same means of communication.Plus, you don't hide clarifications on a general power in the description of one particular critter.
Going by the intent doesn't help here - the pseudodragon should have a detect thoughts ability to work as the flavor text implies - even the ability to respond does not help.
It seems this comes down to how you read the text, though.
Last edited: