The Complete Sneak?

[ivocaliban]

If there is any Complete book that still should be made, its Complete Wild. We need some good Druid support! Grr!!

It's a crafty idea the Complete series. There is quite a bit of Wild support, but it's spread across three different books.

 

[Ankh-Morpork Guard]

It's a crafty idea the Complete series. There is quite a bit of Wild support, but it's spread across three different books.

Exactly. There's quiet a bit of stuff for all the classes in ALL the books, but Druids deserve their own personal book. Though at least CAdv has some of my favorite old PrCs updated from MotW.

 

[the Jester]

I like the Complete series (all of 'em, some more than others). I think that between them all we've got a good amount of stuff for the sneaks. CW has the invisible blade, for instance- one of the best rogue prcs that I've seen! But CAdv has the lion's share (heh, almost mis-typed that 'loin's share' ).

 

[Stone Angel]

So all the other complete series get their own cool little title. So are we to assume that WotC thinks that rogues, bards, and ninja's are the consumate adventurer.

I agree their should have been a wild book but maybe with all of the enviroment and races books they will cover enough ground.


The Seraph of Earth and Stone

 

[Gez]

If there is any Complete book that still should be made, its Complete Wild. We need some good Druid support! Grr!!

I agree that a Complete Gone Wild (generic outdoorsness, druid/ranger magic, and extended rules about exotic animal companions and mounts for all classes) and a Complete Mental (psionic stuff, now that the Mind's Eye web feature is gone) could be added without too much redundancy with the existing four Complete books.

 

[drnuncheon]

I agree that a Complete Gone Wild (generic outdoorsness, druid/ranger magic, and extended rules about exotic animal companions and mounts for all classes) and a Complete Mental (psionic stuff, now that the Mind's Eye web feature is gone) could be added without too much redundancy with the existing four Complete books.

I think a lot of the best classes/PrCs/feats for druids and rangers have already been done, though, so it would probably wind up being either too sparse or too exotic.

Complete Mental is called Hyperconscious, by Bruce Cordell.

J

 

[Altamont Ravenard]

BTW, Complete Adventurer is described as being the guide to Stealth and Subterfuge for all classes...

AR

 

[Davelozzi]

The title Complete Adventurer was a bad choice for this book, it's certainly caused a lot of confusion.

 

[reveal]

The title Complete Adventurer was a bad choice for this book, it's certainly caused a lot of confusion.

Amen to that! I thought it was going to be about general adventuring, not tailored more for rogues and bards. I mean, it makes sense to put out a book for those types of classes, they just should have named it something different. Like Complete Shadow or something like that.

 

[drnuncheon]

The title Complete Adventurer was a bad choice for this book, it's certainly caused a lot of confusion.

Remember when people were dead certain that Complete Warrior was going to be about the NPC class? It'll die down.

Anyway, none of the other proposed titles capture the wide ranges possible for rogues and bards, let alone the other classes. Complete Shadow? For bards? Shadows don't sound very bardy to me.

J