Celebrim
Legend
paradox42 said:This monster is brilliant. Truly, astoundingly a work of art. Two thumbs up, 5 stars. Bravo!
Thanks. Loarsraol is one of my personal favorites too. The biggest problem with him is that he is a VERY challenging NPC to run. If you use him, let me know how it goes.
Then there's his Tenacious Polymorph Any Object SLA. That's not a commonly-used combat spell, but it can have truly nasty uses if done correctly- one of my now-Epic PCs used it on several occasions to turn enemies into dolls or other innocuous objects, and in Loarsraol's case the effect isn't even dispellable once in place (well, technically it is for a few rounds, but it comes back so the dispel is effectively wasted).

Perhaps more importantly, he has Disjunction- one of the famous "nuclear options" of D&D- which means that no buff is safe from him, nor are many magic items. With his Wishes (and note that since it's an SLA he doesn't need to pay XP for it), he can potentially get anything the DM wants him to have- personally I'd let him use this to mimic the automatic-buff-removal effect of Disjunction on one target, no questions asked, but that's me.
Loarsraol is supposed to be about the second most powerful Slaad Lord in the pantheon, behind only the current top dog Ssendam. As one of Ssendam's biggest rivals, he has to be able of being a credible foe. You'll note he's the only one on the list that gets real wishes and not limited wishes.
More interestingly, he's got an ability to Feeblemind a victim by touch that gets around Mind Blank. This alone is a killer for low-Will-save members of the PC party, a category which typically includes exactly the sort of characters who'd be up in melee with Loarsraol anyway.
It's a bit of cheese, but Laorsraol is supposed to be a credible threat to minor dieties so he has to have some credible fearsome ability. Consider what this ability looks like to Modron, Archon, or Devil. Loarsraol is a credible, even terrifying, threat to almost any being on the other side of the wheel, and that was the idea. Primus or Asmodeus takes Loarsraol seriously.
That said, there are three problems I can see with his design. First, his AC is probably too low- certainly it's low for a CR 27 creature (even FC1 Demogorgon, at a mere CR 23, has AC 43), and it's actually the exact same number given to Baseraxs, who is of significantly lower CR than Loarsraol even by your own original estimates.
I don't see a reason to up his AC. At most, the difference in AC between CR 24 and CR 27 should be 2-3 points. He's got plenty of abilities superior to Baserax, whose AC you noted as being significant for his CR, and IMO he doesn't need to be superior in every way. The main reason his AC is low is I consider it thematic for a Paradox to be clumsy and unappealing by comparison to some other impulses. Nobody really feels comfortable with paradoxes, so the being that incarnates them is somewhat less appealing than some of his other incarnate ideas.
Second- SR 26?!? For a CR 27 monster? I admit that a monster having lower SR than his own CR- which would mean that even casters below his CR could never fail SR checks against him- is paradoxical, but please can we raise this?![]()
You'll be happy to know that in his next iteration, it will be going up to 34. That's two above the DR 0 template. That's as high as I'm going, so deal with it (you can always cheese him up to fit your needs).
Give the poor Slaad Lord a break from the enemy spellcasters. And third, he has that great Quintessence ability- as well as the Epic Spellcasting feat- but he has no actual caster levels or Epic spells to use it with. As I pointed out above, per the rules his Wish SLA does not require him to use XP to power it, so the Quintessence is useless for that- and since he doesn't have integrated Sorcerer or Wizard levels, he doesn't get to cast it as an actual spell either. This means that it would normally be used to power Epic spells, but since he hasn't got any Epic spells to use, that sort of makes it useless.![]()
I'll look into it. I could be missing something, but as I read the Epic Spell rules, he neither needs a caster level nor does he need a spell list. He's intended to be able to cast any Epic Spell he could theoretically devise with his +45 bonus to spellcraft (and ability to 'reroll' spellcraft checks) remembering that he's probably 1000's of years old, doesn't sleep, and spends most of his time devising Epic spells. His caster level, when it even matters for an Epic Spell since they don't normally have a caster level as far as I can tell, is intended to be 25. I kinda was leaving the spells he'd use up to the DM since especially as written, the best you can say about Epic Spells is that they can serve as a plot device, but I can look into including a suggested list of spells if you think it would help.
Other things I didn't mention: the Aura of Chaos is a great effect for him, very much in keeping with what the entity represents. I consider it largely combat-neutral, unless he gets something like an Epic spell to call up an army of non-unique slaadi;
Absolutely no reason why he couldn't except that the Epic spell casting rules are notoriously conservative and probably need a second look (its so bad that from a player's perspective, I see no reason to burn the feat on it). But, I personally as a rough guide to what would be reasonable I would think that an epic spell that burns 10,000 XP and summons 30 red slaad for a day of service as a standard action would be just fine.
Last edited: