The FAQ trumps the PHB

[RedShirtNo5]

The FAQ is in direct disagreement with the PHB on the subject of weapon sizes. But the PHB is the primary source, so it trumps the FAQ.

I didn't want to hijack the weapon size thread.

So, for the debating pleasure of this forum:

The FAQ gives the rules when there are questions presented about the rules. If you find something from the Player's Handbook answering one of those questions, you should assume the FAQ is the primary source.

-RedShirt

Errata Rule: Primary Sources
When you find a disagreement between two D&D® rules sources, unless an official errata file says otherwise, the primary source is correct. One example of a primary/secondary source is text taking precedence over a table entry. An individual spell description takes precedence when the short description in the beginning of the spells chapter disagrees.
Another example of primary vs. secondary sources involves book and topic precedence. The Player's Handbook, for example, gives all the rules for playing the game, for playing PC races, and for using base class descriptions. If you find something on one of those topics from the DUNGEON MASTER's Guide or the Monster Manual that disagrees with the Player's
Handbook, you should assume the Player's Handbook is the primary source. The DUNGEON MASTER's Guide is the primary source for topics such as magic item descriptions, special material construction rules, and so on. The Monster Manual is the primary source for monster descriptions, templates, and supernatural, extraordinary, and spell-like abilities.

Do you have questions about the v.3.5 or 3rd edition D&D game rules? Download the official FAQ that best suits your needs. Each FAQ is presented in PDF format so that you can download it, print it, and take it to your game.

If you come upon an apparent contradiction in the rules, consider these factors when adjudicating:
. A rule found in a rulebook overrules one found in a published adventure, unless the rule presented in the published adventure deals with something specific and limited to the adventure itself.
. Choose the rule that you like the best, then stick with it for the rest of the campaign. Consistency is a critical aspect of rule adjudication.

 

[Lord Pendragon]

The FAQ gives the rules when there are questions presented about the rules. If you find something from the Player's Handbook answering one of those questions, you should assume the FAQ is the primary source.

-RedShirt

So does hardness apply to sonic and acid damage, or not?

 

[Thanee]

The FAQ gives the rules when there are questions presented about the rules. If you find something from the Player's Handbook answering one of those questions, you should assume the FAQ is the primary source.

While the FAQ is not perfect, that's how it is supposed to be, yes. Same with RotG.

But in the end, all that matters is what the individual DM/group wants to do.

Bye
Thanee

 

[Rystil Arden]

While the FAQ is not perfect, that's how it is supposed to be, yes. Same with RotG.

But in the end, all that matters is what the individual DM/group wants to do.

Bye
Thanee

Yes, and it is also supposed to be that way with the Sage, but unfortunately, the FAQ, RotG, and Sage are often highly contradictory, with the core books, between each other, and even internally.

 

[Thanee]

It's really not that bad. There are some contradictions, yes, and some parts, which are really hard to figure out why they didn't just stay true to the written rules, but mostly they are quite helpful.

Bye
Thanee

 

[Borlon]

RedShirtNo5,

The quotes you cite don't mention the FAQ at all, only official erratta. According to those quotes, a FAQ has no standing at all. Or am I missing something? (It's early here)

 

[Lonely Tylenol]

The FAQ and Sage are not errata. They are therefore not primary sources. It is possible that the OP was confusing "primary source" and "official source."

 

[RedShirtNo5]

So does hardness apply to sonic and acid damage, or not?

Is that the one where the FAQ itself is contradictory? In that case, look to other rule sources or for analogous situations, as one would normally do. If that doesn't work then "Choose the rule that you like the best, then stick with it for the rest of the campaign." as suggested by the DMG.

Unfortunately, I don't have time this morning to reply to some comments below. Will try to log in again later.

-RedShirt

 

[Dimwhit]

The FAQ is OFFICIAL RULES CLARIFICATION. Errata is for printing errors. The FAQ, despite what some people insist, is official. It is not a rules source that is trumped by the PHB or DMG. It is a rules clarification that makes an OFFICIAL ruling when there is ambiguity in the language or contradictory statements in the core rules (which can also be cleared up in the errata).

The problem with some people saying 'if it's not in the errata, it isn't official' is that Wizard doesn't update the errata regularly. They pretty much do it once (maybe a couple times). That is why they have the FAQ.

 

[Felix]

Official source /= Primary Source
FAQ /= Eratta

PHB + DMG + MM + Eratta = RAW.

All else is... recommendations.

They pretty much do it once (maybe a couple times). That is why they have the FAQ.

The FAQ can create precident in the interpretation of rules, but it does not create rules; thus it is not part of the RAW.

It is a guide, nothing more important that that. And imperfect.