Parmandur
Book-Friend, he/him
Really shows the difference between revenue and profit: at peak revenue, they had started losing money.
Really shows the difference between revenue and profit: at peak revenue, they had started losing money.
That's actually a really common small business mistake: "if we spend X, we make Y profit, if we increase X we will profit even more!" Not how it works.That is fascinating. I knew sales took off around the Dallas Eggbert III incident, but the discrepancy between revenue and profit is staggering.
That's actually a really common small business mistake: "if we spend X, we make Y profit, if we increase X we will profit even more!" Not how it works.
I'll believe that they were not selling well by 2E, when WotC purchased TSR.Also, counter to the lessons FROM TSR adventures sold well. Really well. At least for a while.
Yea, I think that’s wha convinced them. But I think it was taken as more a fact of the ay things are than more of a circumstancial issue. But what do I know.I'll believe that they were not selling well by 2E, when WotC purchased TSR.
Ryan Dancey was certainly no slouch, but he didn't necessarily come to absolute, objective conclusions for all time in his analysis.Yea, I think that’s wha convinced them. But I think it was taken as more a fact of the ay things are than more of a circumstancial issue. But what do I know.
Well no. But I I remember correctly it did seem to become a solid rule of thumb.Ryan Dancey was certainly no slouch, but he didn't necessarily come to absolute, objective conclusions for all time in his analysis.
Yes, and perhaps a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy.Well no. But I I remember correctly it did seem to become a solid rule of thumb.
And who knows, it was probably absolutely true for the time. Cause now that I think about it, adventures were still kinda new back then, and Paizo and now WotC have made their own luck with adventures. They've done things that were not being done then.Yes, and perhaps a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy.