The other side of film dissonance...

Tarrasque Wrangler said:
Jurassic Park? OK, the dinos were as cool as anything I had imagined from reading the book. Everything else about the movie was just wrong though.

I did get the book and read it before I saw the movie. An interesting adaptation, yes. I still liked both. I suppose for the movie they had to switch the personalities of the kids, since otherwise the critics might have roasted it :) Still didn't like the 'anti-tech' stance of either.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

WayneLigon said:


I did get the book and read it before I saw the movie. An interesting adaptation, yes. I still liked both. I suppose for the movie they had to switch the personalities of the kids, since otherwise the critics might have roasted it :) Still didn't like the 'anti-tech' stance of either.

well, it helped that the girl HAD a personality in the movie... It wasn't really a switch, the boy was spunky and cool in his own way, as opposed to the girl in the book...

I have to admit, MC does NOTHING for me. I mean, he takes a decent premise, but ruins it in the execution. His characters are mostly unlikable, and by the end of one of his books, I just don't care what happens to them. I will speak the ultimate blasphemy - Congo, yes EVEN THAT MOVIE was better than his book. And I'm not just saying that cause it had bruce campbell in it. :cool: The movie actually gave me some tiny reason to care if they lived or died. The book really didn't...

Kahuna Burger
 

Remove ads

Top