• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

The State of American Animation

Devil Hunter Yoko! I think that might be it. Let me google it and see if it looks familiar.

EDIT: Yep, that's it! Thanks, Joe! However, it's not on Netflix or Amazon. Bummer! Does it perhaps have an alternate title?

SECOND EDIT: That's because it's Devil Hunter Yohko. Found it on Amazon, but not Netflix. Still bummer!
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad


Joshua Dyal said:
I've seen the Vampire Hunter D movie and don't remember that at all.
I suspect that you and I both saw an edited version. I saw Vampire Hunter D years ago, on TV ; when I saw it again recently, it seemed a bit more...racy than I remembered. And not that good, either.
 

mmadsen said:
I suspect that you and I both saw an edited version. I saw Vampire Hunter D years ago, on TV ; when I saw it again recently, it seemed a bit more...racy than I remembered. And not that good, either.

Like Fist of the North Star, I don't think it's "good" as opposed to... "classic".

I love that stupid hand of his. Talk about a cohort eh?
 

You've got to put the first OVA in context, too. When I first saw it in 1986, there was nothing else like it. By today's standards, it's both tame and disjointed due to a IMHO incomplete adaption from the novel. The Vampire Hunter D Movie, "Bloodlust" is better, but by no means great. Visually, it looks quite nice, and the world setting is a lot of fun. You can also see the differences in what's considered allowable and what kind of budgets they had.

D, like Fist of the Northstar, broke down a lot of barriers. I am curious, though, when you watch these shows, are you watching the English dubs? I'm not a snob about dubbing (in point of fact, for Big 'O', Master Keaton, Inuyasha and several other shows, I PREFER the U.S. voice casts), but many of the stuff I've seen mentioned so far suffered from some really bad dubbing jobs....especially the first wave of dubbed material.

And even some recent dubs don't always work: I'm told that "Witch Hunter Robin" had a terrible English dub (despite a proven and talented cast)...but I listened to Hellsing's English dub, and found it OK. Master Keaton's cast...well, I can imagine them any other way (and frankly, I appreciate the relatively good UK and European accents).
 


Lots of little points I feel like responding to for some reason...

First off, never got Gundam. Or any other giant robot show, actually, but especially Gundam. Bores me to death.

I got into Ranma through the manga, which I found fast paced, funny, and cute. The anime, on the other hand...it just seems to drag a lot of the time. The comedic timing of the comic just isn't there, and almost every decision to deviate from the comic turned out for the worse, imo. Still, it's a quirky series, did better with girls than boys, and I wouldn't fault anyone for not liking it. ;)

Josh: Dude, Tekken Movie not good! I rented it once, and honestly wished I could just wipe the whole thing from my mind. I mean heck, I watched the american versions of Street Fighter, Mortal Kombat, and Darkstalkers, and I wouldn't wish Tekken on anyone. Fatal Fury now, is on my get around to watching someday list...

CN is picking up Naruto? Cool. I'm running out of Adult Swim to watch, anyway. Full Metal Alchemist and Inuyasha are the only shows I can turn too for new episodes these days.
 

Yes, do not get the "Tekken" anime. It really really sucks. Be afraid. Be very afraid.


I wasn't directly responding solely to you, but pointing out that Kim Possible is exactly what it was meant to be.

Oh, I assumed you were directing it to me because ...I think, not sure....that I was the only one that mentioned "Kim Possible".

Anyways, I totally agree with your comments about the show. Your comments also on toylines vs. actually show is spot on too. This is one of the things that irratate me about toy companies. Whether their decision is valid or not, it still irratates me.

The only point I'm a little skeptical on is your comment, " ....is exactly what is was meant to be." I'm not totally sure myself what Disney and the creators of the show "meant" for it to be. But I assumed it was suppose to offer a comdey/action show for girls. They saw "Power Puff Girls" as successful over at Cartoon Network and wanted to offer a show to appeal to a similiar audience. That's the vibe I get from Disney. But I could be off base.

Your version tells it differently. You're saying (and correct me if I'm wrong - we seem to be missing each other on this :) ) that "Kim Possible" was meant to be for boys. Its possible, but I really doubt it. I think it was more like Disney's attempt to match CN's success with "Power Puff Girls" as well as tap into the same audience that enjoyed "Spy Kids". I think its more about that.


Joshua Dyal said:
Why can't you accept that some people simply may not like anime? That's another of my beefs with anime fans in general; many of them refuse to believe that people could not like anime, so they develop this misplaced bitterness against whatever they believe is "holding back" anime from more mainstream popularity. This view is totally wrong IMO.

Personally, I can accept that some people don't like anime. When I was younger I would try to push it on my friends, but I really don't anymore. Not that it matters, I think all my current friends now love anime anyways. Plus, I don't think you're an anime hater anyways Joshua. Like you said, you found some anime that you do like, so in my book, you like anime.

But I agree with your sentiment that no one should try to keep pushing something onto someone else when its clear that they're not going to change their mind about it. Hey, I don't like sea urchin sushi, no one is gonna change my mind about it. :)

Plus, being pushy is counter productive to the goal of getting someone else to like anime. It just makes the situation worse.

Chun-tzu said:
I'm not trying to convert anyone here. I'm saying there's more to anime than what many people have seen on American television.

That's the only reason why I may jump in on a discussion on anime. Sometimes, I'm afraid that a particular person who's debating on the subject has only been exposed to what they've seen on Toonami or something.

First off, never got Gundam. Or any other giant robot show, actually, but especially Gundam. Bores me to death.

Yeah, if you're not into it, you're not into it. But on a side note: there are different types of Gundam. In the same way that Batman has "elseworlds" versions like "Gotham by Gaslight" , Gundam has the same. Gundam Wing, G-Gundam, Gundam Seed, and such aren't the real Gundam. I personally like the original Gundam like, Gundam:Stardust Memories and Gundam:8th MS Team. But even watching those might not get someone to become a Gundam fan.

I kinda equate Gundam with Lord of the Rings and other old classic fantasy books. The fans say this is where it started and its the classics, then people read it and are bored/not entertained. At a time when all big robot shows were the same formula crazy scientist uncle make big machine with rocket fists , Gundam came out and offered more realistic sci-fi like robot action. The creator was influence by Asimov, Clarke and such. There was no faster than light travel, there was a reason why people didn't just launch missiles at each other long range, there were many elements that made it more "realistic". This was the show that was a turning point to bring in a different era of the "more realistic" robot series. Like Votoms and Macross.

The hard part about getting someone to like Gundam is that....there's no jumping in point that is particularly good to jump in at. The story is very dependant on you knowing the world and how it works. Its technology, its politics, its timeline. To do that, you gotta watch from the beginning. To do that....you gotta watch the old late 70's original show (which they haven't redone in newer animation). But come on...who's gonna watch that old looking show? Then after than you gotta watch Gundam Zeta and Gundam ZZ (the two tv series). But they don't have those for sale in America. And those two tv series were the ones that got everyone from being fan to a fanatic. So successful the stories were that they are trying to recreate is success by basically following the same formula in other Gundam incarnations.

Its like getting someone to like Star Trek Next Generation cast and giving them only the movies. Then they come back and go, " I dont' see the big deal". Then you say, "well, you should probably see the original tv series"....but they don't sell it.

Gundam is weird that way. Its too big an investment to get into properly. Because of this, I rarely pimp this show out. I've actually was able to get one other friend into it, but he's a special case. He didn't mind the footwork that went into going back and starting from the stone age. But even going back and doing all this won't mean you'll like it. If it doesn't appeal to your tastes....it doesn't appeal to your tastes. Heh heh.

As far as big robots are concerned, I personally like the more realistic ones. Like "Patlabor", "Macross", "Gundam", and the like. But every now and then I like the silly over the top stuff too. Like "Mazinkaiser". :)
 

Well, on the combined recommendations of everyone here, Tekken is coming off my Netflix queue. Sadly, Netflix also does not have the Fatal Fury anime, and I don't want to buy it from Amazon just to see it.

Although I've heard good things about it, and as a fan of the game (and that whole genre of game, for that matter) I probably wouldn't regret the purchase. Unless it's extremely expensive.
 

Chain Lightning said:
I really like "Naruto". I've only seen maybe six episodes. But I liked 'em.

I was talking with friends of mine and we discussed similarities in story structures. Like, when you say "this is is like that but with this instead". For instance: "Magnificient Seven" is "Seven Samurai", but set in the wild west. "Bug's Life" is "Seven Samurai", but with bugs.

With that, we said, "Naruto" is "Harry Potter", but with ninjas instead of wizards. You guys agree? :D

I disagree. While there are some similarities, they all seem to be only skin-deep.

The most basic one is the grouping of the protagonists in both stories. Both have a boy as the main character, with another boy and a girl as his closest friends and teammates. There's also a very powerful, but somewhat hands-off teacher who watches out for them. Likewise, the girl is usually much smarter, in terms of book-smarts, than her companions.

A few other similarities are that the main character each has a particular hidden power within them, and is orphaned as a baby, and grew up with some sort of undeserved prejudice levelled against them. Likewise, the main villain in each series is obsessed with immortality.

However, there are differences than similarities in my mind. For example, there is no dichotomy of "magic vs. mundane" in Naruto like there is in Harry Potter; the ninja world in Naruto has the ninjas as being a well-known and (apparently) a popular profession.

Likewise, the character relationships are quite different. Harry doesn't chase after Hermione the way Naruto does after Sakura, and likewise Hermione doesn't fawn all over Ron the way Sakura does over Sasuke. On the same note, Ron isn't bitter or obsessed with revenge the way Sasuke is.

Likewise, the antagonist structure is different too. All villainy in Harry Potter can be traced, either directly or indirectly, to Voldemort. In Naruto, while Orochimaru is a major villain, other villains like Zabuza and Itachi have either nothing or almost nothing to do with him. Also, whereas Voldemort needs to defeat Harry, Orochimaru barely even knows Naruto's name.

I could go on, but I think I've made my point. The two are a bit similar in construction, but it's like saying two houses painted red are the same house: it's obvious when you look inside that they aren't really that similar at all.
 
Last edited:

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top