Henadic Theologian
Legend
I mean even the titles of the two books were placeholders, and D&D Direct Video & D&D Beyond Article didn't even agree on the placeholder name for the second book, & the video doesn't mention that the general Setting lore update is in the player book not the DM book, but the Beyond Article did.
So no one should treat the features of these books listed in video & article as definitive.
It's possibly they hadn't made final decisions on the Artificer or Species when it was time for the announcement.
Thoughts?
So no one should treat the features of these books listed in video & article as definitive.
It's possibly they hadn't made final decisions on the Artificer or Species when it was time for the announcement.
Thoughts?