Extreme analogy and merger of distinct persons into something of a caricature with enough truth to recognizable?Sarcasm?
So ... do y'all want a + thread for Warlording?
Here's what I would recommend:
1. Have someone set up the thread ("PERSON A"). Decide what you want as the "base class" (Monk, Bard, Warlock, whatever).
2. The base class OGL text will be copied into the first post on the thread, along with basic instructions (GO FORTH AND MAKE A WARLORD).
3. Then have someone else be designated as the moderator/caller ("PERSON B"). PERSON B decides when a consensus is reached on a feature in the thread, and will @ PERSON A to make changes to the "official" version in the first post.
4. Continue on until the class is finished.
Dividing up between A and B should simplify things, edits, etc. One person to make edits to the "main" doc, one person to decide when the consensus is reached, etc.
Since we don't have group-editable posts anymore, this is what I've been brainstorming. For something else, but it should work for this.
There used to the ability to create a wiki thread the people could edit.
in between bouts of insulting Paladins and insulting everyone else (sometimes on purpose) I’ve been trying to think of more useful things.
As momma always told me, “Boy. If you can’t be part of the solution, become a part of the problem.”
Wait . Dang it! That explains so much.
Well this is why Captain is a better name.So the burning question I would have is this- what do you call a multiclassed Warlord/Warlock?
The Lordlock?
The Locklord?
.....the WARWAR? That's the Kool-Aid Man .... OH YEAH!
In 5e, Extra Attack is not a striker feature outside of the Fighter. Every other warrior uses some other feature on top of EA to attain “striker” damage. Extra attack is there to create a similar damage baseline to cantrips.Extra Attack is very much a "striker" feature, at-will, single-target, DPR maximization, and the way 5e 6-8-encounter-balance focuses on average DPR over a long time, is too highly-valued for any more-versatile (as support must be) class to get more than one (like the Valor Bard for instance).
Could run into the same issues as MDDs, where they couldn't strike a balance making the alternatives useful enough to be worth giving you the damage, some of the time, but not others.
As a Warlord sub-class, like the Bravura, it could get a single helping of Extra Attack and better armor (there's certainly precedent for a sub-class adding things like that), more like a War Cleric than a Paladin, though, really, there's not a huge gulf between them, anyway.
So ... do y'all want a + thread for Warlording?
Here's what I would recommend:
1. Have someone set up the thread ("PERSON A"). Decide what you want as the "base class" (Monk, Bard, Warlock, whatever).
2. The base class OGL text will be copied into the first post on the thread, along with basic instructions (GO FORTH AND MAKE A WARLORD).
3. Then have someone else be designated as the moderator/caller ("PERSON B"). PERSON B decides when a consensus is reached on a feature in the thread, and will @ PERSON A to make changes to the "official" version in the first post.
4. Continue on until the class is finished.
Dividing up between A and B should simplify things, edits, etc. One person to make edits to the "main" doc, one person to decide when the consensus is reached, etc.
Since we don't have group-editable posts anymore, this is what I've been brainstorming. For something else, but it should work for this.