sigfile
Explorer
Accuracy and DPR go hand-in-hand. A discussion centered on whether-or-not a class is broken because of its accuracy will end up using DPR as a benchmark. The thief is no more absurdly accurate than a standard rogue.
KarinsDad - your numbers aren't right. A first level PHB-only rogue with CA 80% of the time has DPR very much in-line with a first level thief with 100% CA. There's no arms race... at least, not within the rogue class.
I suspect it's the ease with which the thief gets combat advantage (and thus improved accuracy and sneak attack) at range that's the source of a lot of concern. That's not without a cost. A thief that doesn't wade in to the fight and actually *flank* a foe denies combat advantage to another party member (and the chance to use Acrobat's Trick for additional damage). A thief that lets the defender soak up all the damage is wasting his healing surges. A thief that never makes himself a tempting target is wasting his defender's retaliation techniques.
KarinsDad - your numbers aren't right. A first level PHB-only rogue with CA 80% of the time has DPR very much in-line with a first level thief with 100% CA. There's no arms race... at least, not within the rogue class.
I suspect it's the ease with which the thief gets combat advantage (and thus improved accuracy and sneak attack) at range that's the source of a lot of concern. That's not without a cost. A thief that doesn't wade in to the fight and actually *flank* a foe denies combat advantage to another party member (and the chance to use Acrobat's Trick for additional damage). A thief that lets the defender soak up all the damage is wasting his healing surges. A thief that never makes himself a tempting target is wasting his defender's retaliation techniques.