This Weekend @ The Boxoffice: 2011_Aug.22

Hand of Evil

Hero
Epic
And I enjoyed Conan, thought it was a great visual movie and better than the first! :confused: Oh, man was I wrong about what it would pull in, thought between 25 and 30, even 32 million but it BOMBED!

Weekend Report: 'The Help' Reigns Over Gutless 'Conan,' 'Fright Night'
by Brandon Gray -- August 21, 2011

It was a box-office bloodbath for Conan the Barbarian and Fright Night among others over the weekend. On the bright side, The Help climbed to the top spot, due to a combination of a strong hold and those weak new releases, while Rise of the Planet of the Apes took second.

The Help eased 21 percent to an estimated $20.5 million, lifting its total to $71.8 million in 12 days. It marked the first time since early January that a movie has risen to No. 1 after previously debuting lower. The last instance was True Grit, but the more thematically comparable The Blind Side also did it. The Help has dusted Julie & Julia and Eat Pray Love, the past female-driven August book adaptations that inspired its release, by a wide margin.

Rise of the Planet of the Apes extended its lead over most past comparable titles, including X-Men: First Class and G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra, and continued to hold much better than Planet of the Apes (2001). Rise dipped 41 percent to an estimated $16.3 million, growing its sum to $133.8 million in 17 days.

The top-grossing new release, Spy Kids: All the Time in the World, mustered just $12 million on approximately 4,400 screens at 3,295 locations. It's the worst-performing Spy Kids movie by far, grossing a little over a third of the last one, Spy Kids 3D: Game Over (and trailing even further in attendance). It even fell short of Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore from last summer. The eight-year wait did the Spy Kids franchise no favors, as both the original characters and audience out-grew it. The new movie was aimed squarely at tykes, alienating the parents who were necessary to take them, and it lacked a new angle or clear premise, besides its "Aroma-scope" gimmick. Spy Kids 4's run included 3D presentations at nearly 1,350 locations, and they accounted for 44 percent of the gross. According to distributor The Weinstein Company, 67 percent of Spy Kids 4's audience was female and 65 percent was kids under 12 years old.

Conan the Barbarian went the way of past August fantasy/ancient action movies and flopped hard. Joining the ranks of Kull the Conqueror and The Last Legion and grabbing less interest than even The 13th Warrior, Conan reaped an estimated $10 million on around 4,500 screens at 3,015 locations. It was a far cry from the 1982 Conan, which had over three times the attendance on its opening weekend, though it had a similar gross ($9.6 million).

The Conan remake's marketing relied on the brand name and generic fantasy action instead of presenting a compelling story and strong characters. The movie's director, Marcus Nispel, was also responsible for the similar dud Pathfinder. With roughly 2,100 locations, 3D was 61 percent of Conan's take. Distributor Lionsgate's exit polling showed that 65 percent of Conan's was male and 69 percent was over 25 years old.

Fellow 1980s redux Fright Night was even less attractive than Conan, and, while it didn't carry the same wannabe blockbuster burden as Conan, it was backed by a more aggressive marketing campaign. Fright Night drew an estimated $8.3 million (including Thursday night previews) on close to 4,600 screens at 3,114 locations, and the gross was low even by the modest standards of unromantic vampire movies. It was much worse than Priest and Vampires Suck from the same weekend last year and grossed a fraction of its Disturbia inspiration. Such failures as Jennifer's Body and The Hitcher remake were more comparable.

The original Fright Night made $6.1 million its first weekend back in August 1985, but the remake had around half the attendance, despite having over twice the locations. Included in the Fright Night remake's run were 3D presentations at 2,220 locations, and they made up 61 percent of the gross. The DreamWorks production was distributed by Walt Disney Pictures, which reported a demographic breakdown of 60 percent male and 60 percent over 25 years old.

The Smurfs was neck-and-neck with Fright Night for fifth place. It was down 42 percent, pulling in an estimated $8 million for a smurfy $117.7 million sum in 24 days.

One Day was largely ignored with an estimated $5.1 million debut at 1,719 single-screen locations, ranking ninth. It was near the bottom among romantic dramas.

Meanwhile, Final Destination 5 saved no face, tumbling 57 percent, which was worse than its predecessor, and grossing an estimated $2.4 million for an anemic $32.3 million ten-day tally.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Rank 9/10
  • X-Men: First Class
  • Harry Potter Deathly Hollows 2
Rank 8/10
  • Fast Five (strong)
  • Captain America
  • Rise of the Planet of the Apes
  • Transformers (weak)
  • Conan (weak 8 / strong 7)
Rank 7/10
  • Pirates (strong)
  • Cowboys & Aliens
  • The Change-Up
  • Hangover 2
  • THOR (weak)
Rank 6/10
  • Green Lantern (weak)
  • Priest (weak)
 

And I enjoyed Conan, thought it was a great visual movie and better than the first! :confused: Oh, man was I wrong about what it would pull in, thought between 25 and 30, even 32 million but it BOMBED!


I was wrong, too, and was glad to warn people away from Conan. I gave it a 4 on IMDb and I rarely even give bad movies anything below a 5 if the productions values are strong and at least one area shows promise (writing, directing, acting, etc). I gave Nispel's Pathfinder a 6, FWIW.

But Conan was absolutely so poorly directed and scripted that I was amazed. It's REH, for Pete's sake. The characters, much of the dialogue, and the plots are all there. And talk about cinematic and unconfusing combat that jumps off the page? The worse thing you can say about the first movies (and they weren't very good) was that Arnold was clunky and the stories tried to be a bit cutsie at times. This new Conan is just a mess with Momoa being one of the few decent parts (if only they gave him dialogue to work with!) and Lang doing the best he could with horrible writing. It certainly appeared, also, that Lang was able to work without a decent director and didn't have many bad takes for the final cut because it looks like every other actor in the movie had bad takes show up in the movie I saw. That takes a director who doesn't use enough film to get good options and then chooses bad ones.

There's a scene right after they check the priestesses for pure blood when they take a wide shot with the priestesses cowering and Lang doing something unspeakable to the high priest with all of the bad guy entrouage hovering around, a real tableau worthy of a Frazetta painting and McGowen is literally falling off of her platform Goth boots. Seriously, all the actors have to do is hold still while the director gets six or seven seconds of footage, and you'd think they would have shot this a few times to be sure of lighting and whatnot, and then there's hot, tightly-clad Rose McGowan reeling across the shot.

The combat was the best thing about the movie and it's all over the place. Every combat scene seems to have at least a couple of shots that just don't fit the sequence or are long when they should be tight, or tight when they should be long, and blood spurts in odd directions considering the wounds, etc, etc, etc. The best combat sequence is the one in the trailer with the young Conan.

Some of these thoughts are expansions of my review right after seeing the film which I posted here.
 
Last edited:


Remove ads

Top