Hawken said:
Just because they are listed as Neutral doesn't mean they are Evil 15 days out of the month and Good the other 15 days (in a 30 day month

). Not being Good doesn't automatically make one Evil.
If the "not being Good" is absolute, then yes, it does. As I mentioned above:
Lord Pendragon said:
If you consider Neutrality to be a mixture of Good and Evil, then the complete lack of Good shifts the Slaadi into Evil. If you consider Neutrality to be the absence of Good and Evil, then the presence of Evil shifts the Slaadi into Evil.
I'd be interested in another definition of Neutral that allows the Slaadi, at present, to exist in their current incarnation and deserve their current alignment.
Just because grizzly bears don't pull drowning people out of rivers or lead lost children back to civilization doesn't make them Evil just because they're not helping out the less fortunate.
Non-intelligent creatures do not exist in a moral world. We're talking about the Slaadi, who have a listed Int of 6-14 (excepting the Death Slaad, which actually
is listed as Chaotic-Evil.)
They're concerned with eating, sleeping and propagation of their species. Slaadi propagate by injecting eggs into others. That is not an Evil act, just an instinctive urge to ensure the survival of their species. Its no different than a hunter killing an animal to ensure his survival (by eating its prey).
It's absolutely different, because the Slaadi are hunting sentient creatures, and know it. Put the shoe on the other foot. If a human society existed by eating half-orcs, would you consider them evil?
Zappo said:
Personally, I go by their 2E behaviours. Formians have Good tendencies, they don't enslave everyone and they don't seek to conquer the entire multiverse. Slaadi do what they want to do, but since they're not Evil they don't always want to hurt people; and they have other things to do besides breeding.
I could definitely see go along with this.
Shemeska said:
There's actually been examples of CG slaadi. It may be that slaadi exposed to evil in their surroundings may shift to CG to balance out the evil around them in hopes of creating a balance of CN. There was a CG slaadi in the Abyss that went around protecting people from Tanar'ri. A second example of such, everyone's favorite slaadi, Xanxost, seemed to lament this fact somewhat, finding himself becoming more CG than CN from exposure to Tanar'ri during his "research"*
I did not know this, and love it.

It does make me less upset with D&D in general.

I guess many DMs merely see slaadi as too good a combat foe to pass up. At least you've show me that there's some core D&D stuff that portrays them as something other than Death Slaadi of varying colors.