rounser said:Word. But your universal theorem of monster motivation falls apart at one particular juncture, hong: what about undead?
Ghouls only score 1 out of 3. Vampires slightly better; 1, maybe 2 out of 3. Most of the rest aren't interested in eating, crapping, or bonking. Thus, while your hypothesis shows promise, I suggest that it needs revision and further analysis. Might be a good topic for a thesis.
Hmph. Some people are never satisfied.
How about:
1) Sex
2) Drugs and
3) Rock 'n Roll
Now while it's true that undead don't _need_ to have sex, we're not talking about behaviours that are absolutely necessary to survival here. It's entirely conceivable that undead, being appreciative of the finer things in life, would want to have sex for its own sake. For example, consider the aforesaid Count Dracula, who seems to have had a thing for cute young English chyxx0rs, in spite of being one of the living dead. Or consider any recent Anne Rice novel. 'nuff said, wouldn't you think?
As for drugs, that's clearly a metaphor for the many unholy substances that go into powering an undead being's actions. You don't become a slavering unliving horror just by eating your greens at dinner, after all. No, certain dubious substances have to be involved, and I see no contradiction at all in considering these substances to be the fantasy equivalent of modern-day narcotics. In fact, if we again think of Anne Rice's vampires, these guys seemed to consume an entire South American country's output of pharmaceuticals every month.
And rock 'n roll is surely a no-brainer. Go to any goth nightclub, and you will see hordes of pale, pallid creatures of the night, grooving the night away to the strains of the most chic music. Anne Rice is truly the queen of the vampires!
Hong "why, I'll even forgive her writing _Atlas Shrugged_" Ooi