IcyCool
First Post
Hypersmurf said:However... I fear I must agree that there's a difference between 'your racial bonus' and 'a bonus equal to your racial bonus'.
This still feels very shaky. Is this the best argument against it?
Hypersmurf said:However... I fear I must agree that there's a difference between 'your racial bonus' and 'a bonus equal to your racial bonus'.
Coredump said:With your interpretation, the feat means your AC against giants goes *down* by taking that feat. That makes no sense at all.
IcyCool said:This still feels very shaky. Is this the best argument against it?
Hypersmurf said:What, you don't like the Paladin/Blackguard comparison?
-Hyp.
IcyCool said:Actually, I'd like a reference for not allowing a bonus to apply twice. Otherwise, my interpretation of the titan fighting feat is still valid.
Fieari said:Interesting example. I think that, if faced with such a feat, I would read it as double dex...
IcyCool said:Actually, I'd like a reference for not allowing a bonus to apply twice. Otherwise, my interpretation of the titan fighting feat is still valid.
Hypersmurf said:If I create a feat that allows you to add your Dex bonus to AC (limited by the max Dex bonus of armor), would you consider that 'Sweet! Double Dex!' or 'Meh - I can do that already without the feat'?
-Hyp.
IcyCool said:The character would not be able to add twice their Dex bonus, but that's because you can't stack Dex bonuses.