Red Baron said:A few have mentioned swimming toads. Uh, them's frogs...
![]()
Kai Lord said:The downside is that evil Evokers will have fewer opportunities to stand defiantly against the party mage and say, "Do you know what happens to a toad when its struck by lightning?"
Fair enough -- some toads can swim reasonably well, although the distinction between "frog" and "toad" is one largely based on habitat and physiology (no chicken and egg arguments, here): both are technically amphibians, of course, but toads tend to live on land.JEL said:Actually, toads swim pretty well. Being amphibians, like frogs, they have to have water to breed.
Zhure said:Of course, my Sorcerer had the best hit points in the group, with his good CON, Toughness and Toad.
drnuncheon said:It's working game balance on the Magic: the Gathering theory. Put it out there, see what gets overused, and then take it away in the next edition.
Why WOTC doesn't have a cadre of in-house munchkins to test their stuff is beyond me. (I have to wonder...no 3e playtesters were abusive munchkins?)
hong said:I suspect that Living Greyhawk and other RPGA campaigns fill that function for them.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.