Green Knight
First Post
Oldtimer said:Wrong under 3.x rules. He is not surprised, but since the goblin acted before him, he would most certainly be flat-footed at that point.
Yeah, you're right. Been a while since I've played regularly.

Oldtimer said:Wrong under 3.x rules. He is not surprised, but since the goblin acted before him, he would most certainly be flat-footed at that point.
Kaodi said:So, I am thinking that perhaps the spellbook still governs that extra 20%, and the staff the other 80%. Perhaps a wizard without a staff is like a fighter without a sword using improved unarmed strike. Makes me wonder if you could in fact specialize in using magic without a staff and spellbook. Kind of like the 4e equivalent of a sorcerer, but still using the wizard class.
I'm thinking aasimars and tieflings getting more powerful as they advance, like the Bloodlines in UA.jasin said:Eh, I hope not. I like the idea of racial progressions such as the racial paragon classes from UA, or abilities themed for a particular race-class combination such as those found in racial substitution levels but I don't like the idea of actually chaging your race. It has it's place as a plot device (Ashardalon becoming a half-fiend, for example) but I don't like it as a generally available option.
Now, if you're just talking about what the abilities might look like, I guess that's OK. But even then, I'm not thrilled with the idea of wings sproutin' out of tieflings' and eladrins' backs. :\
BTW, does anybody else think it's funny that in 3E half-celestial humans are more celestial than celestial humans?![]()
Klaus said:Now can you imagine a high-level LG tiefling paladin with the racial ability to cast "blasphemy"?![]()
I was suggesting a scenario of a devil-descended warrior who is dedicated to all that is Good and Just, and still, by virtue (or is it vice?) of her bloodline, has very Evil powers available (but which she chooses to never use).Zurai said:I'd much rather imagine a LE tiefling paladin with the racial ability to cast Blasphemy.
I've always thought it was stupid that paladins were forced into LG. I much prefer paladins the way, for example, "The Deed of Paksenarrion" presents them - exemplars of their deity or deities.
Jhaelen said:I doubt warforged will be in the first PHB, but the eladrin might very well be - might make sense as a counterpoint for the tiefling.
Klaus said:LE tiefling with blasphemy? That's run-of-the-mill.
Zurai said:Really? I wasn't aware LE tiefling paladins were common in any available edition of the game.