QLI/RPGRealms
First Post
qstor said:I agree 100% that a second edition needs to be done to make T20 compatible for the D20 Future OGL rules and fix some bugs like the computer rules.
Not going to happen nor will T20 adapt to d20 Modern.
Hunter
qstor said:I agree 100% that a second edition needs to be done to make T20 compatible for the D20 Future OGL rules and fix some bugs like the computer rules.
Garnfellow said:...I would either use Erica Balsley's non-heroic d20 Modern rules or True20, rather than the classes, feats, and skills found there.
Flynn said:I'm not familiar with these non-heroic d20 Modern rules. Could you point me towards them, please?
Then you guys are taking the strictly OGL route and make the SRD into something your own, yes?QLI/RPGRealms said:Not going to happen nor will T20 adapt to d20 Modern.
Ranger REG said:Then you guys are taking the strictly OGL route and make the SRD into something your own, yes?
Will you be addressing things like dead levels and whatnot?
QLI/RPGRealms said:If by that you mean levels where no feats or other specials are gained, this is already addressed in the current version.
Psion said:Well, as long as you don't multiclass. If you multiclass, things get a little funky... but it's an error in the player's favor.
If you (being the reader, not Hunter, necessarily) are particularly concerned about this, it would be an simple fix just to adopt the True20 approach, i.e., grant one feat per level regardless of class, and not have feats from both classes and general advancement. The drawback to this is that T20's feat tables aren't sorted like True20's, but you could make a thumbrule like half of your feats have to be from the class feat list in order to maintain the class flavor.
QLI/RPGRealms said:Well one of the ideas I am toying with is dropping classes and levels in favor of development through spending earned experience instead. I've got some draft rules up in our Moot subscriber area right now. Whether this actually happens or not is another issue![]()
Yeah, that's what I mean, using the SRD to make your own rules for the game.QLI/RPGRealms said:Don't know about an SRD but yes T20 is going strictly OGL and dropping the d20 logo.
Ranger REG said:Yeah, that's what I mean, using the SRD to make your own rules for the game.
When you guys had the logo, you came out with a $50 "companion" rulebook. What will be different this time around (in terms of price, content, and quality)?
What is your one-year (or six-month) plan for the T20 line?